• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善临床试验受试者招募与留存的干预措施:一项评估当前实践及未来优先事项的调查与研讨会

Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities.

作者信息

Bower Peter, Brueton Valerie, Gamble Carrol, Treweek Shaun, Smith Catrin Tudur, Young Bridget, Williamson Paula

机构信息

National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:399. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-399
PMID:25322807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4210542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite significant investment in infrastructure many trials continue to face challenges in recruitment and retention. We argue that insufficient focus has been placed on the development and testing of recruitment and retention interventions.

METHODS

In this current paper, we summarize existing reviews about interventions to improve recruitment and retention. We report survey data from Clinical Trials Units in the United Kingdom to indicate the range of interventions used by these units to encourage recruitment and retention. We present the views of participants in a recent workshop and a priority list of recruitment interventions for evaluation (determined by voting among workshop participants). We also discuss wider issues concerning the testing of recruitment interventions.

RESULTS

Methods used to encourage recruitment and retention were categorized as: patient contact, patient convenience, support for recruiters, monitoring and systems, incentives, design, resources, and human factors. Interventions felt to merit investigation by respondents fell into three categories: training site staff, communication with patients, and incentives.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant resources continue to be invested into clinical trials and other high quality studies, but recruitment remains a significant challenge. Adoption of innovative methods to develop, test, and implement recruitment interventions are required.

摘要

背景

尽管在基础设施方面投入巨大,但许多试验在招募和留住参与者方面仍面临挑战。我们认为,在招募和留住参与者干预措施的开发和测试方面关注不足。

方法

在本文中,我们总结了关于改善招募和留住参与者的干预措施的现有综述。我们报告了来自英国临床试验单位的调查数据,以表明这些单位用于鼓励招募和留住参与者的干预措施范围。我们展示了最近一次研讨会参与者的观点以及一份用于评估的招募干预措施优先清单(由研讨会参与者投票确定)。我们还讨论了有关招募干预措施测试的更广泛问题。

结果

用于鼓励招募和留住参与者的方法分为:患者联系、患者便利、对招募人员的支持、监测与系统、激励措施、设计、资源和人为因素。受访者认为值得研究的干预措施分为三类:培训现场工作人员、与患者沟通和激励措施。

结论

临床试验和其他高质量研究仍在投入大量资源,但招募仍然是一项重大挑战。需要采用创新方法来开发、测试和实施招募干预措施。

相似文献

1
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities.改善临床试验受试者招募与留存的干预措施:一项评估当前实践及未来优先事项的调查与研讨会
Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:399. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399.
2
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK surgical trials: a survey and focus groups with stakeholders to identify practices, views, and experiences.英国外科试验中的患者及公众参与(PPI):一项针对利益相关者的调查及焦点小组讨论,以确定实践情况、观点和经验。
Trials. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3183-0.
3
'Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment' - the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials.“招募,招募,招募”——需要更加关注留存率:对五项试验的定性研究
Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0.
4
Culturally Competent Strategies for Recruitment and Retention of African American Populations into Clinical Trials.将非裔美国人纳入临床试验的招募与保留的文化胜任策略。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):460-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12285. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials.确定临床试验中有效保留策略的研究重点。
Trials. 2017 Aug 31;18(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z.
6
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study.利用詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目确定试验招募的不确定性——PRioRiTy(随机试验中的招募优先排序)研究
Trials. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4.
7
Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings.反思在英国范围内的妇科门诊环境中开展一项多中心随机对照试验时在招募方面所面临的方法学挑战。
Trials. 2013 Nov 15;14:389. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-389.
8
Qualitative analysis of feasibility of recruitment and retention in a planned randomised controlled trial of a psychosocial cancer intervention within the NHS.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内进行的一项心理社会癌症干预计划随机对照试验中,对招募和留住参与者的可行性进行定性分析。
Trials. 2018 Jun 22;19(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2728-y.
9
Methods to improve patient recruitment and retention in stroke trials.改善中风试验中患者招募和保留率的方法。
Int J Stroke. 2016 Aug;11(6):663-76. doi: 10.1177/1747493016641963. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.在一项评估随机对照试验招募和保留策略的试验中进行研究:从 PROMETHEUS 研究计划中吸取的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(2):1-114. doi: 10.3310/HTQW3107.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a Study Within a Trial to evaluate a decision support intervention for families deciding about research on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent (CONSULT SWAT).在试验中开展一项研究的可行性,该研究旨在评估一种决策支持干预措施,用于帮助代表无同意能力的成年人做出研究相关决策的家庭(CONSULT SWAT)。
Trials. 2025 Aug 27;26(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09021-3.
2
Effects of a non-standard information leaflet on patient recruitment in acute care: Embedded cluster-randomised controlled trial.非标准信息传单对急性护理中患者招募的影响:嵌入式整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0327634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327634. eCollection 2025.
3
Taxonomy of chronic illness research recruitment: a restricted scoping review.慢性病研究招募的分类学:一项限定性范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13115-8.
4
Inclusion of under-served groups in trials: an audit at a UK primary care clinical trials unit.将服务不足群体纳入试验:英国基层医疗临床试验单位的一项审计
Trials. 2025 Jun 21;26(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08893-9.
5
Planning for successful participant recruitment and retention in trials of behavioural interventions: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Wrapped intervention.行为干预试验中成功招募和留住参与者的规划:Wrapped干预的可行性随机对照试验
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 29;4(5):e0000875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000875. eCollection 2025 May.
6
The effect of physical exercises on TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 cytokines expression and NK cells in cancer.体育锻炼对癌症患者肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-6和白细胞介素-8细胞因子表达及自然杀伤细胞的影响。
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2025 Jan-Mar;66(1):89-98. doi: 10.47162/RJME.66.1.08.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of a pilot randomized trial of a single session of imagery rescripting targeting the primary consequences of negative experiences with eating and appearance.一项针对饮食和外貌负面经历主要后果的单次意象改写试点随机试验的可行性和可接受性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Apr 23;11(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01630-8.
8
Digital Health Platform for Maternal Health: Design, Recruitment Strategies, and Lessons Learned From the PowerMom Observational Cohort Study.孕产妇健康数字健康平台:设计、招募策略及从PowerMom观察性队列研究中获得的经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 7;9:e70149. doi: 10.2196/70149.
9
Design of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of interrupting sitting on type 2 diabetes risk factors in children with overweight/obesity: The sedentary behavior study 3 protocol.一项随机对照试验的设计,旨在测试中断久坐对超重/肥胖儿童2型糖尿病风险因素的影响:久坐行为研究3方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107862. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107862. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
10
Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review.少数民族成年患者参与临床试验的促进因素和障碍:一项系统综述。
Trials. 2025 Feb 22;26(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08769-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.为考虑参与临床试验的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD009736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.
2
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise.试验方法学研究议程:优先事项设定活动的结果
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.
3
SWAT 1: what effects do site visits by the principal investigator have on recruitment in a multicentre randomized trial?SWAT 1:在多中心随机试验中,主要研究者进行的现场访视对招募工作有何影响?
J Evid Based Med. 2013 Aug;6(3):136-7. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12049.
4
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3(12):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2.
5
Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: longitudinal study.患者参与心理健康研究的影响:纵向研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;203(5):381-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119818. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
6
Recruitment to clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation.招募临床试验参与者:对参与原因的研究的元民族志综合分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Oct;18(4):233-41. doi: 10.1177/1355819613483126. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.重新调查随机对照多中心试验的招募情况:对两个英国资助机构资助的试验的综述。
Trials. 2013 Jun 9;14:166. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166.
8
Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.提高随机对照试验招募效果的方法:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 7;3(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360. Print 2013.
9
The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011).患者缺失模型被推翻:一项定性研究调查了患者对参与一项比较浸润性膀胱癌选择性膀胱保留与手术治疗的随机对照试验(SPARE,CRUK/07/011)邀请的看法。
Trials. 2012 Nov 29;13:228. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-228.
10
Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision.支持积极的体验和持续参与临床试验:超越信息提供。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Dec;38(12):751-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100059. Epub 2012 Aug 8.