• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using digital tools in the recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials: survey of UK Clinical Trial Units and a qualitative study.在随机对照试验中使用数字工具进行招募和保留:对英国临床试验单位的调查和定性研究。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04234-0.
2
What are the main inefficiencies in trial conduct: a survey of UKCRC registered clinical trials units in the UK.试验实施中的主要低效因素有哪些:对英国UKCRC注册的临床试验单位的一项调查。
Trials. 2018 Jan 8;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2378-5.
3
Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.数字工具在随机对照试验中招募和保留参与者的应用:系统图谱。
Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04358-3.
4
Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.在一项评估随机对照试验招募和保留策略的试验中进行研究:从 PROMETHEUS 研究计划中吸取的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(2):1-114. doi: 10.3310/HTQW3107.
5
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
6
Flourishing and job satisfaction in employees working in UK clinical trial units: a national cross-sectional survey.英国临床试验单位员工的工作满意度与职业发展:一项全国性横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11986-x.
7
Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials.确定临床试验中有效保留策略的研究重点。
Trials. 2017 Aug 31;18(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Makes It Through the Funnel? Sociodemographic Drivers of Recruitment Completion into an AI-Ready Digital Speech Bank.谁能通过筛选流程?人工智能就绪数字语音库招募完成的社会人口学驱动因素
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 21:2025.08.18.25333909. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.18.25333909.
2
Social media recruitment enhances participant diversity in dermatology clinical trial: findings from the SAFA trial.社交媒体招募可提高皮肤科临床试验参与者的多样性:SAFA试验的结果
Trials. 2025 Aug 27;26(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08994-5.
3
Experience of older adults using smart devices and mHealth apps in nursing homes in Chinese megacities: A descriptive qualitative study.中国特大城市养老院中老年人使用智能设备和移动健康应用程序的体验:一项描述性定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 20;11:20552076251353334. doi: 10.1177/20552076251353334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
The role of intersectionality in shaping participant engagement with health research through digital methods: findings from a qualitative study.交叉性在通过数字方法塑造参与者对健康研究的参与度方面的作用:一项定性研究的结果
Trials. 2025 Jun 21;26(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08929-0.
5
Pilot implementation of short message service for randomisation in a multisite pragmatic factorial clinical trial in Kenya.在肯尼亚开展的一项多中心实用析因临床试验中,用于随机分组的短信服务的试点实施。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Mar 12;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01610-y.
6
Developing generic clinical trial animated explainer videos in the UK: results of a survey and case study.在英国制作通用型临床试验动画解释视频:一项调查及案例研究结果
Trials. 2025 Jan 21;26(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08687-5.
7
The role of patient ergonomics in improving health research participation.患者工效学在提高健康研究参与度方面的作用。
Appl Ergon. 2025 May;125:104458. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104458. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
8
Interpretation of statistical findings in randomised trials: a survey of statisticians using thematic analysis of open-ended questions.随机试验中统计结果的解读:对使用开放式问题的主题分析的统计学家的调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02366-4.
9
Recommendations to promote equity, diversity and inclusion in decentralized clinical trials.促进去中心化临床试验中公平、多样性和包容性的建议。
Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3075-3084. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03323-w. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
10
A qualitative exploration of advantages and disadvantages to using technology in the process of randomised controlled trial recruitment.对在随机对照试验招募过程中使用技术的利弊进行的定性探索。
HRB Open Res. 2024 Jun 6;6:56. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13776.2. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating Digital Tools to Improve Clinical Trial Infrastructure: A White Paper From the Digital Engagement Committee of SWOG.整合数字工具以改善临床试验基础设施:来自SWOG数字参与委员会的白皮书
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-8. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00122.
2
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?试验构建指南1:试验中的研究(SWAT)是什么?
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5.
3
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.提高随机试验招募率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.
4
Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.临床试验招募规划:来自临床试验转型倡议的一个拟议框架
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials.确定临床试验中有效保留策略的研究重点。
Trials. 2017 Aug 31;18(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z.
6
Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme.随机对照试验中参与者的招募与保留:对由英国卫生技术评估计划资助并发表的试验的综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e015276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276.
7
Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study.将技术融入复杂干预试验过程:一项案例研究。
Trials. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1674-9.
8
Fifty million people use computerised self triage.五千万人使用计算机化的自我分诊。
BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3727.
9
Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform.提高随机试验的效率:首次讨论试验锻造平台会议的报告
Trials. 2015 Jun 5;16:261. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0776-0.
10
Clinical trial management of participant recruitment, enrollment, engagement, and retention in the SMART study using a Marketing and Information Technology (MARKIT) model.使用营销与信息技术(MARKIT)模型对SMART研究中参与者的招募、入组、参与和留存进行临床试验管理。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 May;42:185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

在随机对照试验中使用数字工具进行招募和保留:对英国临床试验单位的调查和定性研究。

Using digital tools in the recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials: survey of UK Clinical Trial Units and a qualitative study.

机构信息

National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC), University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7NS, UK.

Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04234-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04234-0
PMID:32245506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7118862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a key determinant of success but is challenging. Trialists and UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) are increasingly exploring the use of digital tools to identify, recruit and retain participants. The aim of this UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) study was to identify what digital tools are currently used by CTUs and understand the performance characteristics required to be judged useful.

METHODS

A scoping of searches (and a survey with NIHR funding staff), a survey with all 52 UKCRC CTUs and 16 qualitative interviews were conducted with five stakeholder groups including trialists within CTUs, funders and research participants. A purposive sampling approach was used to conduct the qualitative interviews during March-June 2018. Qualitative data were analysed using a content analysis and inductive approach.

RESULTS

Responses from 24 (46%) CTUs identified that database-screening tools were the most widely used digital tool for recruitment, with the majority being considered effective. The reason (and to whom) these tools were considered effective was in identifying potential participants (for both Site staff and CTU staff) and reaching recruitment target (for CTU staff/CI). Fewer retention tools were used, with short message service (SMS) or email reminders to participants being the most reported. The qualitative interviews revealed five themes across all groups: 'security and transparency'; 'inclusivity and engagement'; 'human interaction'; 'obstacles and risks'; and 'potential benefits'. There was a high level of stakeholder acceptance of the use of digital tools to support trials, despite the lack of evidence to support them over more traditional techniques. Certain differences and similarities between stakeholder groups demonstrated the complexity and challenges of using digital tools for recruiting and retaining research participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies identified a range of digital tools in use in recruitment and retention of RCTs, despite the lack of high-quality evidence to support their use. Understanding the type of digital tools in use to support recruitment and retention will help to inform funders and the wider research community about their value and relevance for future RCTs. Consideration of further focused digital tool reviews and primary research will help to reduce gaps in the evidence base.

摘要

背景

招募和保留随机对照试验(RCT)的参与者是成功的关键决定因素,但具有挑战性。试验人员和英国临床研究合作组织(UKCRC)临床试验单位(CTU)越来越多地探索使用数字工具来识别、招募和保留参与者。这项英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)研究的目的是确定 CTU 目前使用的数字工具,并了解被判断为有用所需的性能特征。

方法

进行了一次范围广泛的搜索(并对 NIHR 资助人员进行了一项调查),对所有 52 个 UKCRC CTU 和 16 个定性访谈进行了调查,涉及包括 CTU 内的试验人员、资助者和研究参与者在内的五个利益相关者群体。在 2018 年 3 月至 6 月期间,采用有针对性的抽样方法进行了定性访谈。使用内容分析和归纳方法对定性数据进行了分析。

结果

24 个(46%)CTU 的回复表明,数据库筛选工具是招募中使用最广泛的数字工具,大多数被认为是有效的。这些工具被认为有效的原因(以及对谁有效)是识别潜在参与者(既针对站点工作人员,也针对 CTU 工作人员)并达到招募目标(针对 CTU 工作人员/CI)。使用的保留工具较少,报告最多的是给参与者发送短消息服务(SMS)或电子邮件提醒。定性访谈揭示了所有群体共有的五个主题:“安全性和透明度”;“包容性和参与度”;“人际互动”;“障碍和风险”;和“潜在利益”。尽管缺乏支持使用数字工具超过传统技术的证据,但利益相关者高度接受使用数字工具来支持试验。在利益相关者群体之间存在一定的差异和相似性,这表明使用数字工具招募和保留研究参与者的复杂性和挑战。

结论

尽管缺乏支持使用数字工具的高质量证据,但我们的研究确定了在 RCT 招募和保留中使用的一系列数字工具。了解用于支持招募和保留的数字工具类型将有助于为资助者和更广泛的研究界提供有关其未来 RCT 价值和相关性的信息。考虑进一步进行有针对性的数字工具审查和基础研究将有助于缩小证据基础的差距。