• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激强度对健康个体双眼竞争率的影响:对基因、临床及个体差异研究的启示

The effect of stimulus strength on binocular rivalry rate in healthy individuals: Implications for genetic, clinical and individual differences studies.

作者信息

Law Phillip C F, Miller Steven M, Ngo Trung T

机构信息

Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2017 Nov 1;181:127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.023
PMID:28859877
Abstract

Binocular rivalry (BR) occurs when conflicting images concurrently presented to corresponding retinal locations of each eye stochastically alternate in perception. Anomalies of BR rate have been examined in a range of clinical psychiatric conditions. In particular, slow BR rate has been proposed as an endophenotype for bipolar disorder (BD) to improve power in large-scale genome-wide association studies. Examining the validity of BR rate as a BD endophenotype however requires large-scale datasets (n=1000s to 10,000s), a standardized testing protocol, and optimization of stimulus parameters to maximize separation between BD and healthy groups. Such requirements are indeed relevant to all clinical psychiatric BR studies. Here we address the issue of stimulus optimization by examining the effect of stimulus parameter variation on BR rate and mixed-percept duration (MPD) in healthy individuals. We aimed to identify the stimulus parameters that induced the fastest BR rates with the least MPD. Employing a repeated-measures within-subjects design, 40 healthy adults completed four BR tasks using orthogonally drifting grating stimuli that varied in drift speed and aperture size. Pairwise comparisons were performed to determine modulation of BR rate and MPD by these stimulus parameters, and individual variation of such modulation was also assessed. From amongst the stimulus parameters examined, we found that 8cycles/s drift speed in a 1.5° aperture induced the fastest BR rate without increasing MPD, but that BR rate with this stimulus configuration was not substantially different to BR rate with stimulus parameters we have used in previous studies (i.e., 4cycles/s drift speed in a 1.5° aperture). In addition to contributing to stimulus optimization issues, the findings have implications for Levelt's Proposition IV of binocular rivalry dynamics and individual differences in such dynamics.

摘要

当同时呈现给每只眼睛相应视网膜位置的冲突图像在感知中随机交替时,就会发生双眼竞争(BR)。在一系列临床精神疾病中,已经对BR速率异常进行了研究。特别是,慢BR速率已被提议作为双相情感障碍(BD)的一种内表型,以提高大规模全基因组关联研究的效能。然而,要检验BR速率作为BD内表型的有效性,需要大规模数据集(n = 1000至10000)、标准化测试方案以及刺激参数的优化,以最大程度地分离BD组和健康组。这些要求确实适用于所有临床精神科BR研究。在这里,我们通过研究刺激参数变化对健康个体BR速率和混合感知持续时间(MPD)的影响来解决刺激优化问题。我们旨在确定能以最少的MPD诱导最快BR速率的刺激参数。采用重复测量的被试内设计,40名健康成年人使用在漂移速度和孔径大小上有所变化的正交漂移光栅刺激完成了四项BR任务。进行成对比较以确定这些刺激参数对BR速率和MPD的调节作用,并且还评估了这种调节的个体差异。在所研究的刺激参数中,我们发现1.5°孔径下8个周期/秒的漂移速度能诱导最快的BR速率且不增加MPD,但这种刺激配置下的BR速率与我们先前研究中使用的刺激参数(即1.5°孔径下4个周期/秒的漂移速度)诱导的BR速率没有实质性差异。除了有助于解决刺激优化问题外,这些发现还对双眼竞争动力学的Levelt命题IV以及这种动力学中的个体差异具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
The effect of stimulus strength on binocular rivalry rate in healthy individuals: Implications for genetic, clinical and individual differences studies.刺激强度对健康个体双眼竞争率的影响:对基因、临床及个体差异研究的启示
Physiol Behav. 2017 Nov 1;181:127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Evidence that eye-movement profiles do not explain slow binocular rivalry rate in bipolar disorder: support for a perceptual endophenotype.证据表明,眼球运动模式并不能解释双相情感障碍中双眼竞争的缓慢速率:支持知觉内表型。
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Sep;19(6):465-476. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12515. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
Dichoptic viewing methods for binocular rivalry research: prospects for large-scale clinical and genetic studies.用于双眼竞争研究的分视观察方法:大规模临床和基因研究的前景
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Dec;16(6):1033-78. doi: 10.1017/thg.2013.76.
4
No Relationship Between Binocular Rivalry Rate and Eye-Movement Profiles in Healthy Individuals: A Bayes Factor Analysis.健康个体中双眼竞争率与眼动特征之间无关联:贝叶斯因子分析
Perception. 2015;44(6):643-61. doi: 10.1177/0301006615594267.
5
A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry.对莱尔特关于双眼竞争的第二个命题的一项测试。
Vision Res. 1993 Jul;33(10):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90047-z.
6
Difference in binocular rivalry rate between patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.双相I型障碍患者与双相II型障碍患者在双眼竞争率上的差异。
Bipolar Disord. 2009 Aug;11(5):539-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00719.x.
7
Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.尺寸很重要:双眼竞争动态研究。
J Vis. 2009 Jan 15;9(1):17.1-11. doi: 10.1167/9.1.17.
8
Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.刺激闪烁在双眼竞争期间改变双眼分组。
Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
9
Extending Levelt's Propositions to perceptual multistability involving interocular grouping.将莱尔特的命题扩展到涉及双眼分组的知觉多稳态。
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
10
Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate.双眼竞争率个体差异的遗传贡献。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 9;107(6):2664-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912149107. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of affective states and traits on perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.情感状态和特质对双眼竞争过程中知觉稳定性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 17;13(1):8046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35089-5.
2
Slower and Less Variable Binocular Rivalry Rates in Patients With Bipolar Disorder, OCD, Major Depression, and Schizophrenia.双相情感障碍、强迫症、重度抑郁症和精神分裂症患者的双眼竞争率较慢且变异性较小。
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 21;13:514. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00514. eCollection 2019.