Suppr超能文献

饮食失调基线风险因素中的年龄效应及预防干预效果。

Age effects in eating disorder baseline risk factors and prevention intervention effects.

作者信息

Rohde Paul, Stice Eric, Shaw Heather, Gau Jeff M, Ohls Olivia C

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Nov;50(11):1273-1280. doi: 10.1002/eat.22775. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Examine the impact of age on baseline eating disorder symptoms/risk factors and on the effects of completing three variants of an eating disorder prevention program.

METHOD

Six hundred and eighty women (60% White) were randomized to clinician-led Body Project groups, peer-led Body Project groups, an Internet-based version of the Body Project (eBodyProject), or educational video control condition. Participants, who were on average 22.2 years old (SD = 7.1, range 17-64, median = 19), were assessed at pretest, posttest, and 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Two of the seven baseline variables were significantly associated with age, indicating that older age was associated with lower reported dieting (r = -.12) and better psychosocial functioning (r = -.13). Interactions indicated that age moderated the intervention effects, such that group-based programs were superior to the Internet-delivered version in terms of eating disorder symptom reductions for women up to age 20, whereas the Internet-delivered program was superior to group-based interventions, particularly in terms of BMI reduction, for women over approximately age 25. None of the four tests examining whether age moderated the effects of delivering Body Project groups by mental health clinicians versus undergraduate peer educators were significant.

DISCUSSION

Results suggest that group-based versions of the Body Project should be implemented with young women up to the age of 20, as they produce larger eating disorder symptom reductions, whereas the Internet version of the Body Project should be implemented with women aged 25 or older, as it produces superior weight loss/gain prevention effects.

摘要

目的

研究年龄对基线饮食失调症状/风险因素的影响,以及对完成三种饮食失调预防项目变体效果的影响。

方法

680名女性(60%为白人)被随机分配到由临床医生主导的身体项目组、由同龄人主导的身体项目组、基于互联网的身体项目版本(电子身体项目)或教育视频对照组。参与者平均年龄为22.2岁(标准差=7.1,范围17 - 64岁,中位数=19岁),在预测试、后测试和6个月随访时进行评估。

结果

七个基线变量中的两个与年龄显著相关,表明年龄较大与报告的节食较少(r = -0.12)和更好的心理社会功能(r = -0.13)相关。交互作用表明年龄调节了干预效果,对于20岁及以下的女性,基于小组的项目在减少饮食失调症状方面优于互联网提供的版本,而对于大约25岁以上的女性,互联网提供的项目优于基于小组的干预措施,特别是在降低体重指数方面。四项检验年龄是否调节心理健康临床医生与本科同龄人教育者实施身体项目小组效果的测试均无显著差异。

讨论

结果表明,基于小组的身体项目版本应针对20岁及以下的年轻女性实施,因为它们能更大程度地减少饮食失调症状,而互联网版本的身体项目应针对25岁及以上的女性实施,因为它能产生更好的体重减轻/增加预防效果。

相似文献

1
Age effects in eating disorder baseline risk factors and prevention intervention effects.
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Nov;50(11):1273-1280. doi: 10.1002/eat.22775. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Moderators of two dual eating disorder and obesity prevention programs.
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
6
Integrating eating disorder and weight gain prevention: a pilot and feasibility trial of INSPIRE.
Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Jun;25(3):761-775. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00685-w. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Prevention of eating disorders in at-risk college-age women.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;63(8):881-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.881.
8
Effects of a prototype Internet dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program at 1- and 2-year follow-up.
Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1558-67. doi: 10.1037/hea0000090. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
9
Effectiveness of an eating disorder preventative intervention in primary care medical settings.
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Dec;75:32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

4
Multidimensional perfectionism and orthorexia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eat Weight Disord. 2024 Oct 10;29(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01695-z.
5
Managing Binge Eating Disorder in a Young Adolescent Female: Barriers to Treatment and Recommendations.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54237. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
9
Weighing in: qualitative explorations of weight restoration as recovery in anorexia nervosa.
J Eat Disord. 2023 Jan 31;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00736-9.
10
Sizing up the crowd: Assessing spatial integration difficulties in body size judgements across eating disorder symptomatology.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1003250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003250. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Participant feedback from peer-led, clinician-led, and internet-delivered eating disorder prevention interventions.
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Dec;49(12):1087-1092. doi: 10.1002/eat.22605. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
3
Effects of a prototype Internet dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program at 1- and 2-year follow-up.
Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1558-67. doi: 10.1037/hea0000090. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
An effectiveness trial of a new enhanced dissonance eating disorder prevention program among female college students.
Behav Res Ther. 2013 Dec;51(12):862-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
8
A body image and disordered eating intervention for women in midlife: a randomized controlled trial.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Dec;79(6):751-8. doi: 10.1037/a0026094. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
9
Methods for synthesizing findings on moderation effects across multiple randomized trials.
Prev Sci. 2013 Apr;14(2):144-56. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0207-8.
10
Perceived weight status, overweight diagnosis, and weight control among US adults: the NHANES 2003-2008 Study.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Aug;35(8):1063-70. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.229. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验