Stice Eric, Durant Shelley, Rohde Paul, Shaw Heather
Oregon Research Institute.
Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1558-67. doi: 10.1037/hea0000090. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
A group-based eating disorder prevention program wherein young women explore the costs of pursuing the thin ideal reduces eating disorder risk factors and symptoms. However, it can be challenging to identify school clinicians to effectively deliver the intervention. The present study compares the effects of a new Internet-based version of this prevention program, which could facilitate dissemination, to the group-based program and to educational video and educational brochure control conditions at 1- and 2-year follow-up.
Female college students with body dissatisfaction (n = 107; M age = 21.6, SD = 6.6) were randomized to these 4 conditions.
Internet participants showed reductions in eating disorder risk factors and symptoms relative to the 2 control conditions at 1- and 2-year follow-up (M -d = .34 and .17, respectively), but the effects were smaller than parallel comparisons for the group participants (M -d = .48 and .43, respectively). Yet the Internet intervention produced large weight gain prevention effects relative to the 2 control conditions at 1- and 2-year follow-up (M -d = .80 and .73, respectively), which were larger than the parallel effects for the group intervention (M -d = .19 and .47, respectively).
Although the effects for the Internet versus group intervention were similar at posttest, results suggest that the effects faded more quickly for the Internet intervention. However, the Internet intervention produced large weight gain prevention effects, implying that it might be useful for simultaneously preventing eating disordered behavior and unhealthy weight gain.
一项基于群体的饮食失调预防计划,年轻女性在其中探索追求瘦身理想的代价,可降低饮食失调风险因素及症状。然而,识别能有效实施该干预措施的学校临床医生可能具有挑战性。本研究比较了这种预防计划的新型基于互联网版本(这可能有助于传播)与基于群体的计划以及教育视频和教育手册对照条件在1年和2年随访时的效果。
对107名存在身体不满的女大学生(年龄均值M = 21.6,标准差SD = 6.6)进行随机分组,分为上述4种条件。
在1年和2年随访时,相对于两种对照条件,互联网组参与者的饮食失调风险因素及症状有所减少(效应量M -d分别为0.34和0.17),但效果小于群体组参与者的平行比较结果(效应量M -d分别为0.48和0.43)。然而,在1年和2年随访时,相对于两种对照条件,互联网干预产生了较大的预防体重增加的效果(效应量M -d分别为0.80和0.73),大于群体干预的平行效果(效应量M -d分别为0.19和0.47)。
尽管在测试后互联网干预与群体干预的效果相似,但结果表明互联网干预的效果消退得更快。然而,互联网干预产生了较大的预防体重增加的效果,这意味着它可能对同时预防饮食失调行为和不健康的体重增加有用。