Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 22;6(8):e006071. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006071.
Data are limited regarding outcomes of deferred lesions in patients with angiographically insignificant stenosis but low fractional flow reserve (FFR). We investigated the natural history of angiographically insignificant stenosis with low FFR among patients who underwent routine 3-vessel FFR measurement.
From December 2011 to March 2014, 1136 patients with 3298 vessels underwent routine 3-vessel FFR measurement (3V FFR-FRIENDS study, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01621438), and this study analyzed the 2-year clinical outcomes of 1024 patients with 2124 lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis (percentage of diameter stenosis <50%), in which revascularization was deferred. All lesions were classified according to FFR values, using a cutoff of 0.80 (high FFR >0.80 versus low FFR ≤0.80). The primary end point was outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization) at 2 years. Mean angiographic percentage of diameter stenosis and FFR of total lesions were 32.5±10.3% and 0.91±0.08%, respectively. Among the total lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis, 8.7% showed low FFR (185 lesions). The incidence of lesions with low FFR was 2.5%, 3.8%, 9.0%, and 15.1% in categories of percentage of diameter stenosis <20%, 20% to 30%, 30% to 40%, and 40% to 50%, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, the low-FFR group showed a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with the high FFR group (3.3% versus 1.2%, hazard ratio: 3.371; 95% CI, 1.346-8.442; =0.009). In multivariable analysis, low FFR was the most powerful independent predictor of future MACE in deferred lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.617; 95% CI, 1.026-6.679; =0.044).
In deferred angiographically insignificant stenosis, lesions with low FFR showed significantly higher event rates than those with high FFR. FFR was an independent predictor of future major adverse cardiovascular events in lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01621438.
关于血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显但血流储备分数(FFR)较低的患者中延迟病变的结果数据有限。我们研究了在常规进行三血管 FFR 测量的患者中,FFR 较低的血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显的病变的自然病史。
2011 年 12 月至 2014 年 3 月,1136 例患者的 3298 支血管接受了常规三血管 FFR 测量(3V FFR-FRIENDS 研究,ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT01621438),本研究分析了 1024 例患者的 2124 处血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显的病变(狭窄程度百分比 <50%)的 2 年临床结果,其中血运重建被延迟。所有病变均根据 FFR 值进行分类,截断值为 0.80(高 FFR >0.80 与低 FFR ≤0.80)。主要终点是 2 年时主要不良心血管事件(心脏死亡、心肌梗死和缺血驱动血运重建的复合终点)的结果。总病变的平均血管造影狭窄程度百分比和 FFR 分别为 32.5±10.3%和 0.91±0.08%。在血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显的总病变中,8.7%的病变 FFR 较低(185 处病变)。FFR 较低的病变发生率分别为<20%、20%至 30%、30%至 40%和 40%至 50%时为 2.5%、3.8%、9.0%和 15.1%。在 2 年随访期间,低 FFR 组与高 FFR 组相比,主要不良心血管事件的风险显著更高(3.3%比 1.2%,风险比:3.371;95%CI,1.346-8.442;=0.009)。多变量分析显示,低 FFR 是血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显的延迟病变中未来 MACE 的最强独立预测因子(调整后的风险比:2.617;95%CI,1.026-6.679;=0.044)。
在延迟的血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显的病变中,FFR 较低的病变的事件发生率明显高于 FFR 较高的病变。FFR 是血管造影显示狭窄程度不明显的病变中未来主要不良心血管事件的独立预测因子。