Rasmussen Lucinda A Lee
1 San Diego State University, School of Social Work, CA, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Aug;62(10):2937-2953. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17726550. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
This 6-year prospective study is the first to compare two psychometrically sound risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth: JSORRAT-II and MEGA. Cross-validated on representative samples of over 500 youth, these measures have cutoff scores, allowing for a more exact assessment of risk. Study sample consisted of 129 male adjudicated adolescents housed in a secured residential treatment facility for sexually abusive youth. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that MEGA Risk Scale was mildly predictive of sexual recidivism over a 6-year period (mean follow-up = 15.6 months)-area under the curve (AUC) = .67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.52, 0.82]; p < .015. JSORRAT-II was not predictive (AUC = .57; 95% CI = [0.42, 0.72]; p < .297). The study contributes to scant literature on the most contemporary, statistically robust risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth.
这项为期6年的前瞻性研究首次比较了两种针对性虐待青少年的心理测量学上可靠的风险评估工具:JSORRAT-II和MEGA。这些测量方法在500多名青少年的代表性样本上进行了交叉验证,有临界分数,能够更精确地评估风险。研究样本包括129名被判定有罪的男性青少年,他们被安置在一家为性虐待青少年设立的安全寄宿治疗机构中。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,MEGA风险量表在6年期间(平均随访 = 15.6个月)对性再犯有轻度预测性——曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.67;95%置信区间[CI] = [0.52, 0.82];p < 0.015。JSORRAT-II没有预测性(AUC = 0.57;95% CI = [0.42, 0.72];p < 0.297)。该研究为关于性虐待青少年的最现代、统计上稳健的风险评估工具的稀少文献做出了贡献。