Miccio-Fonseca L C, Rasmussen Lucinda A Lee
a Clinic for the Sexualities, San Diego, CA, USA.
b School of Social Work, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Child Sex Abus. 2018 Nov-Dec;27(8):871-900. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1537337. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Risk assessment of sexually abusive youth is a specialty, which ideally includes a clinical assessment (e.g., psychological evaluation) utilizing a validated risk assessment tool. This article reviews tools for assessing sexual improprieties and/or sexually abusive behaviors in youth: , and and a clinical assessment tool, . Untested, structured, clinical checklists with face validity, and , are included. The authors also highlight clinical dilemmas using "utility tools" (i.e., polygraph and plethysmograph) with sexually abusive youth. The comprehensive review sustains a twenty-first-century of inclusive ecologically based, developmentally and gender-sensitive assessment tools that definitively and accurately assess risk and protective factors of sexually abusive youth.
对有性虐待行为的青少年进行风险评估是一个专业领域,理想情况下包括使用经过验证的风险评估工具进行临床评估(例如心理评估)。本文回顾了用于评估青少年性不当行为和/或性虐待行为的工具:[具体工具1]、[具体工具2]以及一种临床评估工具[具体工具3]。还包括未经测试但具有表面效度的结构化临床检查表[具体检查表1]和[具体检查表2]。作者还强调了在对有性虐待行为的青少年使用“实用工具”(即测谎仪和体积描记器)时所面临的临床困境。这项全面综述支持在21世纪采用基于生态、具有发展性和性别敏感性的包容性评估工具,以明确且准确地评估有性虐待行为的青少年的风险和保护因素。