Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Although midwife care is slowly but consistently increasing in the United States, not much is known regarding women who use a midwife. Our objectives were to compare the sociodemographic and health history characteristics, and the quality of patient-provider communication, between women who used a midwife and those who used a physician for prenatal care and/or birth.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the nationally representative Listening to Mothers III survey. We report descriptive findings using weighted proportions and means with standard deviations. We used the two one-sided tests procedure to assess the equivalence of women who used midwives and those who used physicians.
Nearly 13% of women used a midwife for prenatal care or as a birth attendant. Women who used a midwife for prenatal care were similar to women who used a physician in most sociodemographic and health history characteristics, as well as their patient-provider communication scores, with the exception of the percentage of White (61.7 ± 5.0 [midwives], 54.3 ± 1.5 [physicians]) and married women (68.7 ± 4.9 [midwives], 60.6 ± 1.5 [physicians]). Women who used a midwife as a birth attendant were similar to women who used a physician as a birth attendant in most characteristics, with the exception of age over 35 years (7.5 ± 1.6 [midwives], 15.7 ± 1.1 [physicians]) and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children support (56.8 ± 4.9 [midwives], 50.0 ± 1.6 [physicians]).
Women who use midwives are similar to those who use physicians and our findings do not confirm the common perception that midwife patients are a self-selected group of wealthier, more educated women.
尽管美国的助产士护理服务在缓慢但持续地增加,但对于使用助产士的女性了解甚少。我们的目的是比较使用助产士和使用医生进行产前护理和/或分娩的女性的社会人口统计学和健康史特征,以及医患沟通质量。
我们对具有全国代表性的“倾听母亲 III 调查”进行了横断面分析。我们使用加权比例和均值加标准差报告描述性发现。我们使用双侧单边检验程序来评估使用助产士和使用医生的女性的等效性。
近 13%的女性使用助产士进行产前护理或分娩。使用助产士进行产前护理的女性在大多数社会人口统计学和健康史特征以及医患沟通评分方面与使用医生的女性相似,除了白人比例(61.7±5.0[助产士],54.3±1.5[医生])和已婚女性比例(68.7±4.9[助产士],60.6±1.5[医生])外。作为分娩助手使用助产士的女性在大多数特征上与使用医生作为分娩助手的女性相似,除了年龄超过 35 岁(7.5±1.6[助产士],15.7±1.1[医生])和特殊补充营养计划为妇女、婴儿和儿童提供支持(56.8±4.9[助产士],50.0±1.6[医生])。
使用助产士的女性与使用医生的女性相似,我们的发现并不能证实助产士患者是一个自我选择的富裕、受过良好教育的女性群体的常见观点。