Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament, Saint-Denis, France.
Transfus Med Rev. 2018 Jan;32(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
Using the French Hemovigilance Network database from 2007 to 2013, we provide information on demographics, incidence, and risk factors of reported transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and possible TRALI, analyze TRALI mitigation efforts for fresh frozen plasma and platelet concentrates, and consider the impact of platelet additive solutions on TRALI incidence. We applied the Toronto consensus conference definitions for TRALI and possible TRALI. Two TRALI subgroups were considered: "antibody positive" when a donor has human leukocyte antigen (class I or II) and/or human neutrophil antigen antibodies and the recipient has cognate antigen, and "antibody negative" when immunological investigation is negative or not done. The analysis targeted 378 cases, divided into antibody-positive TRALI (n=75), antibody-negative TRALI (n=100), and possible TRALI (n=203). TRALI patients were younger and received more blood components than the general population of transfused patients. Moreover, we identified the following clinical conditions where patients seemed to be at higher risk to develop TRALI: postpartum hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, liver transplantation, allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, polytrauma, and thrombotic microangiopathy. Policy measures intended to reduce antibody-positive TRALI were found effective for apheresis platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma but not for whole blood-derived platelet concentrates. The use of platelet additive solutions was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of TRALI following transfusion of buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates but not following transfusion of apheresis platelets. Our data reinforce the concept that possible TRALI and TRALI, as defined in the Canadian consensus conference, share many characteristics. No specific policy measures are currently directed at mitigation of possible TRALI despite its impact on transfusion safety. Despite TRALI mitigation measures, the overall incidence of TRALI cases reported to the French Hemovigilance system was not significantly reduced. Therefore, additional research is needed to reduce, if not eradicate, all TRALI categories.
利用 2007 年至 2013 年法国血液监测网络数据库,我们提供了报告的输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)和可能的 TRALI 的人口统计学、发生率和危险因素信息,分析了新鲜冷冻血浆和血小板浓缩物的 TRALI 缓解措施,并考虑了血小板添加剂溶液对 TRALI 发生率的影响。我们应用了多伦多共识会议对 TRALI 和可能的 TRALI 的定义。考虑了两个 TRALI 亚组:当供体具有人类白细胞抗原(I 类或 II 类)和/或人类中性粒细胞抗原抗体并且受体具有同源抗原时为“抗体阳性”,当免疫研究为阴性或未进行时为“抗体阴性”。该分析针对 378 例病例,分为抗体阳性 TRALI(n=75)、抗体阴性 TRALI(n=100)和可能的 TRALI(n=203)。TRALI 患者比一般输血患者年轻且接受了更多的血液成分。此外,我们确定了以下临床条件,患者似乎在这些条件下发生 TRALI 的风险更高:产后出血、急性髓性白血病、肝移植、同种异体和自体造血干细胞移植、多发伤和血栓性微血管病。旨在减少抗体阳性 TRALI 的政策措施已被证明对单采血小板浓缩物和新鲜冷冻血浆有效,但对全血来源的血小板浓缩物无效。血小板添加剂溶液的使用与输血后缓冲液衍生的血小板浓缩物输注时 TRALI 发生率的显著降低相关,但与单采血小板输注时无关。我们的数据强化了这样一个概念,即加拿大共识会议中定义的可能的 TRALI 和 TRALI 具有许多共同特征。尽管可能的 TRALI 对输血安全有影响,但目前没有针对其的特定政策措施。尽管采取了 TRALI 缓解措施,但向法国血液监测系统报告的 TRALI 病例的总体发生率并未显著降低。因此,需要进一步研究以减少(如果不能消除)所有 TRALI 类别。