• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Enrollment Challenges in Critical Care Nursing Research.重症护理研究中的招募挑战。
Am J Crit Care. 2017 Sep;26(5):395-400. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017511.
2
Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).研究招募实践与重症患者。一项多中心、横断面研究(同意研究)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 1;187(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1537OC.
3
Challenges in enrollment of minority, pediatric, and geriatric patients in emergency and acute care clinical research.少数族裔、儿科和老年患者参与急诊和急性护理临床研究面临的挑战。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;51(6):775-780.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
4
Evaluation of a strategy for enrolling the families of critically ill patients in research using limited human resources.利用有限人力资源招募重症患者家属参与研究的策略评估
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0177741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177741. eCollection 2017.
5
Lessons for successful study enrollment from the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study.来自退伍军人事务部/国立卫生研究院急性肾衰竭试验网络研究的成功研究招募经验教训。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jul;3(4):955-61. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05621207. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
6
Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.个体临床结果对试验参与者在未经同意情况下参与紧急研究的招募观点的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):180-186. doi: 10.1177/1740774516677276. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
A study of consent for participation in a non-therapeutic study in the pediatric intensive care population.一项关于在儿科重症监护人群中参与非治疗性研究的同意书研究。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Feb;40(2):123-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101075. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
8
Obtaining surrogate consent for a minimal-risk research study in the intensive care unit setting.在重症监护病房环境中,为一项低风险研究获得替代同意。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):93-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774512464727. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
9
Strategies for overcoming site and recruitment challenges in research studies based in intensive care units.基于重症监护病房的研究中克服研究地点和招募挑战的策略。
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):410-7. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009400.
10
Consent and enrollment process: achieving high enrollment rates for obstetric research.知情同意与入组流程:实现产科研究的高入组率
Appl Nurs Res. 2016 Feb;29:101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Strategies: Nationwide Data Collection for an Internet-based Guided Relaxation Intervention in Sickle Cell Disease.挑战与策略:镰状细胞病基于互联网的引导式放松干预的全国性数据收集
Pain Manag Nurs. 2025 Aug;26(4):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Cohort profile of Acutelines: a large data/biobank of acute and emergency medicine.队列资料Acutelines:一个大型的急性和急诊医学数据/生物库。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 15;11(7):e047349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047349.
3
Impact of deep oropharyngeal suctioning on microaspiration, ventilator events, and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical trial.深部口咽吸引对微量误吸、呼吸机相关事件及临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):3045-3057. doi: 10.1111/jan.14142. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Telemedicine Provides Noninferior Research Informed Consent for Remote Study Enrollment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.远程医疗为远程研究入组提供非劣效性研究知情同意:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;23(7):759-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.12966. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
2
Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams.影响研究招募的因素:研究团队的经验和看法的定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 23;14:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-10.
3
A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.一项关于非裔美国人、拉丁裔、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民参与少数族裔研究的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
Intensive care unit research and informed consent: still a conundrum.重症监护病房研究与知情同意:仍然是一个难题。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 1;187(11):1164-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0590ED.
5
Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).研究招募实践与重症患者。一项多中心、横断面研究(同意研究)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 1;187(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1537OC.
6
Rates and determinants of informed consent: a case study of an international thromboprophylaxis trial.知情同意率及其决定因素:一项国际血栓预防试验的案例研究。
J Crit Care. 2013 Feb;28(1):28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
7
Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.为什么替代决策人提供或拒绝同意 ICU 研究:一项问卷调查研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jan;38(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2411-1. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
8
Commentary: Improving participant recruitment in clinical and translational research.述评:提高临床和转化研究中的参与者招募效率。
Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1334-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182302831.
9
Patients' preferences for enrolment into critical-care trials.患者对入组重症监护试验的偏好。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Oct;35(10):1703-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1552-y. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
10
Reasons for nonenrollment in a clinical trial of acute lung injury.未纳入急性肺损伤临床试验的原因。
Chest. 2008 Oct;134(4):719-723. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0633. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

重症护理研究中的招募挑战。

Enrollment Challenges in Critical Care Nursing Research.

作者信息

Sole Mary Lou, Middleton Aurea, Deaton Lara, Bennett Melody, Talbert Steven, Penoyer Daleen

机构信息

Mary Lou Sole is dean and professor and holds the Orlando Health Endowed Chair in Nursing at the University of Central Florida College of Nursing, Orlando, Florida. Aurea Middleton and Lara Deaton are clinical research coordinators and Melody Bennett is the study project coordinator, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida. Steven Talbert is a clinical assistant professor with the University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida. Daleen Penoyer is director, Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Practice Nursing, Orlando Health.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2017 Sep;26(5):395-400. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017511.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2017511
PMID:28864436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6015765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enrollment challenges for critical care research are common. Contributing factors include short enrollment windows, the crisis nature of critical illness, lack of research staff, unavailable legal proxy, family dynamics, and language barriers.

OBJECTIVE

To describe enrollment statistics for an ongoing critical care nursing trial, barriers to recruitment, and strategies to enhance enrollment.

METHODS

Two years' worth of recruitment and enrollment data from an oral care intervention trial in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation at 1 hospital were analyzed. Recruitment logs include number of patients screened, eligible, enrolled, and declined and patients' sex, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Target enrollment (15.5 patients per month) was based on experience and historical data. Strategies implemented to promote enrollment included providing study personnel at least 18 hours per day for 7 days per week, regular rounds, communication with direct care staff, and Spanish consent processes. In 2 years, 6963 patients were screened; 1551 (22%) were eligible. Consent was sought from 366 (24% of eligible patients). Enrollment averaged 13.3 patients per month (86% of projected target). The main factor impeding enrollment was unavailability of a legal proxy to provide consent (88%). The refusal rates of white (11%), black (13%), and Hispanic (16%) patients did not differ significantly. However, those classified as Asian or as more than 1 race declined significantly more often (35%) than did white or black patients ( = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Unavailability of a legal proxy within a short enrollment window was the major challenge to enrollment. Various factors influenced consent decisions. Clinical study design requires more conservative estimates.

摘要

背景

重症监护研究面临的入组挑战很常见。促成因素包括入组窗口期短、危重病的危机性质、研究人员短缺、无法获得法定代理人、家庭动态以及语言障碍。

目的

描述一项正在进行的重症监护护理试验的入组统计数据、招募障碍以及提高入组率的策略。

方法

分析了一家医院对接受机械通气的成年危重症患者进行口腔护理干预试验的两年招募和入组数据。招募记录包括筛查、符合条件、入组和拒绝的患者数量以及患者的性别、种族和族裔。

结果

目标入组率(每月15.5名患者)基于经验和历史数据。为促进入组实施的策略包括每周7天每天为研究人员提供至少18小时的时间、定期查房、与直接护理人员沟通以及西班牙语同意程序。在两年内,共筛查了6963名患者;1551名(22%)符合条件。向366名患者(符合条件患者的24%)寻求了同意。入组平均每月13.3名患者(预计目标的86%)。阻碍入组的主要因素是无法获得法定代理人提供同意(88%)。白人(11%)、黑人(13%)和西班牙裔(16%)患者的拒绝率没有显著差异。然而,被归类为亚洲人或属于多个种族的患者拒绝的频率(35%)明显高于白人或黑人患者(P = .02)。

结论

在短时间的入组窗口期内无法获得法定代理人是入组的主要挑战。各种因素影响了同意决定。临床研究设计需要更保守的估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127d/6015765/e3c156c4ae4b/nihms975614f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127d/6015765/e3c156c4ae4b/nihms975614f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/127d/6015765/e3c156c4ae4b/nihms975614f1.jpg