Suppr超能文献

未来护理的讨论和记录:一项前后对照研究,考察了一种替代记录治疗决策方法对急性医院中预先护理计划的影响。

Discussion and documentation of future care: a before-and-after study examining the impact of an alternative approach to recording treatment decisions on advance care planning in an acute hospital.

机构信息

Acute Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Applied Statistics and Epidemiology, Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):e12. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001101. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether discussion and documentation of decisions about future care was improved following the introduction of a new approach to recording treatment decisions: the Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO).

METHODS

Retrospective review of the medical records of patients who died within 90 days of admission to oncology or respiratory medicine wards over two 3-month periods, preimplementation and postimplementation of the UFTO. A sample size of 70 per group was required to provide 80% power to observe a change from 15% to 35% in discussion or documentation of advance care planning (ACP), using a two-sided test at the 5% significance level.

RESULTS

On the oncology ward, introduction of the UFTO was associated with a statistically significant increase in cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions documented for patients (pre-UFTO 52% to post-UFTO 77%, p=0.01) and an increase in discussions regarding ACP (pre-UFTO 27%, post-UFTO 49%, p=0.03). There were no demonstrable changes in practice on the respiratory ward. Only one patient came into hospital with a formal ACP document.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite patients' proximity to the end-of-life, there was limited documentation of ACP and almost no evidence of formalised ACP. The introduction of the UFTO was associated with a change in practice on the oncology ward but this was not observed for respiratory patients. A new approach to recording treatment decisions may contribute to improving discussion and documentation about future care but further work is needed to ensure that all patients' preferences for treatment and care at the end-of-life are known.

摘要

目的

确定在引入一种新的治疗决策记录方法(通用治疗选项表单,UFTO)后,是否改善了对未来护理决策的讨论和记录。

方法

回顾性分析了两个 3 个月期间内肿瘤科或呼吸内科病房入院 90 天内死亡的患者的病历,在 UFTO 实施前和实施后各 70 例。需要每组 70 例的样本量,以在 5%的显著性水平上用双侧检验观察从 15%到 35%的变化,从而提供 80%的效力来观察预先护理计划(ACP)的讨论或记录的变化。

结果

在肿瘤科病房,引入 UFTO 与患者心肺复苏决策记录的统计学显著增加相关(UFTO 前为 52%,UFTO 后为 77%,p=0.01),并且讨论 ACP 的次数增加(UFTO 前为 27%,UFTO 后为 49%,p=0.03)。呼吸科病房的实践没有明显变化。只有一名患者入院时带有正式的 ACP 文件。

结论

尽管患者接近生命末期,但 ACP 的记录有限,几乎没有正式 ACP 的证据。引入 UFTO 与肿瘤科病房的实践变化相关,但这在呼吸科患者中没有观察到。记录治疗决策的新方法可能有助于改善对未来护理的讨论和记录,但需要进一步努力,以确保所有患者在生命末期对治疗和护理的偏好都得到了解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验