Tsuruwaka Mari, Ikeguchi Yoshiko, Nakamura Megumi
Division of Bioethics/Nursing Ethics, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Nursing, Musashino University, Tokyo, Japan.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Jul 13;12(3):289-305. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00135-1. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Although advance care planning (ACP) can lead to more patient-centered care, the communication around it can be challenging in acute care hospitals, where saving a life or shortening hospitalization is important priorities. Our qualitative study in an acute care hospital in Japan revealed when specifically physicians and nurses start communication to facilitate ACP. Seven physicians and 19 nurses responded to an interview request, explaining when ACP communication was initiated with 32 patients aged 65 or older. Our qualitative approach employed descriptive analysis to identify major themes, which included "initiation by patients" and "initiation by healthcare professionals." In the latter case, seven specific triggers were identified: (1) when the patients' medical condition changed in terms of symptom relief, (2) when the patients' medical condition changed in terms of prognostic prediction, (3) when serious events occurred, (4) when a choice of treatment was presented, (5) when the location for end-of-life care was chosen, (6) when the patients' cognitive function deteriorated, and (7) when serious events settled down. Within this group of healthcare professionals, physicians were more focused on changes in their patients' medical condition, whereas nurses focused more on their patients' desire for a long-term perspective. Nurses encouraged patients to consider ACP themselves, which developed into an approach to respect patients' autonomy. In acute care hospitals, it appeared to be desirable to have an early discussion where patients could understand the significance ACP, which would matter even after their discharge from the hospital.
尽管预先护理计划(ACP)能够带来更以患者为中心的护理,但在急症医院,围绕该计划的沟通可能具有挑战性,因为在这类医院中,挽救生命或缩短住院时间是重要的优先事项。我们在日本一家急症医院开展的定性研究揭示了医生和护士具体何时开始进行沟通以促进ACP。七名医生和19名护士回应了访谈请求,解释了与32名65岁及以上患者启动ACP沟通的时间。我们采用定性方法进行描述性分析以确定主要主题,其中包括“患者发起”和“医护人员发起”。在后一种情况下,确定了七个具体触发因素:(1)患者的病情在症状缓解方面发生变化时;(2)患者的病情在预后预测方面发生变化时;(3)发生严重事件时;(4)提供治疗选择时;(5)选择临终护理地点时;(6)患者的认知功能恶化时;(7)严重事件平息时。在这组医护人员中,医生更关注患者病情的变化,而护士更关注患者对长远视角的期望。护士鼓励患者自行考虑ACP,这发展成为一种尊重患者自主权的方式。在急症医院,尽早进行讨论似乎是可取的,以便患者能够理解ACP的重要性,即使在他们出院后这也很重要。