• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

火车事故中多节罐车泄漏情况分析。

Analysis of multiple tank car releases in train accidents.

作者信息

Liu Xiang, Liu Chang, Hong Yili

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, United States.

Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.007
PMID:28865248
Abstract

There are annually over two million carloads of hazardous materials transported by rail in the United States. The American railroads use large blocks of tank cars to transport petroleum crude oil and other flammable liquids from production to consumption sites. Being different from roadway transport of hazardous materials, a train accident can potentially result in the derailment and release of multiple tank cars, which may result in significant consequences. The prior literature predominantly assumes that the occurrence of multiple tank car releases in a train accident is a series of independent Bernoulli processes, and thus uses the binomial distribution to estimate the total number of tank car releases given the number of tank cars derailing or damaged. This paper shows that the traditional binomial model can incorrectly estimate multiple tank car release probability by magnitudes in certain circumstances, thereby significantly affecting railroad safety and risk analysis. To bridge this knowledge gap, this paper proposes a novel, alternative Correlated Binomial (CB) model that accounts for the possible correlations of multiple tank car releases in the same train. We test three distinct correlation structures in the CB model, and find that they all outperform the conventional binomial model based on empirical tank car accident data. The analysis shows that considering tank car release correlations would result in a significantly improved fit of the empirical data than otherwise. Consequently, it is prudent to consider alternative modeling techniques when analyzing the probability of multiple tank car releases in railroad accidents.

摘要

在美国,每年通过铁路运输的危险材料超过200万车皮。美国铁路公司使用大量的罐车将原油和其他易燃液体从生产地运输到消费地。与危险材料的公路运输不同,火车事故可能会导致多辆罐车脱轨和泄漏,这可能会造成严重后果。先前的文献主要假设火车事故中多辆罐车泄漏的发生是一系列独立的伯努利过程,因此在已知脱轨或受损罐车数量的情况下,使用二项分布来估计罐车泄漏的总数。本文表明,在某些情况下,传统的二项式模型可能会错误地高估多辆罐车泄漏的概率,从而显著影响铁路安全和风险分析。为了弥补这一知识空白,本文提出了一种新颖的、替代性的相关二项式(CB)模型,该模型考虑了同一列车中多辆罐车泄漏的可能相关性。我们在CB模型中测试了三种不同的相关结构,并发现基于罐车事故实证数据,它们都优于传统的二项式模型。分析表明,考虑罐车泄漏的相关性将比不考虑时显著改善对实证数据的拟合。因此,在分析铁路事故中多辆罐车泄漏的概率时,谨慎考虑替代性建模技术是明智的。

相似文献

1
Analysis of multiple tank car releases in train accidents.火车事故中多节罐车泄漏情况分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.007.
2
Analysis of railroad tank car releases using a generalized binomial model.使用广义二项式模型对铁路罐车泄漏进行分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Nov;84:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
3
Probability analysis of multiple-tank-car release incidents in railway hazardous materials transportation.铁路危险货物运输中多车罐式货车泄漏事故概率分析。
J Hazard Mater. 2014 Jul 15;276:442-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Improving the design of higher-capacity railway tank cars for hazardous materials transport: optimizing the trade-off between weight and safety.改进用于危险材料运输的大容量铁路罐车设计:优化重量与安全之间的权衡。
J Hazard Mater. 2008 Dec 15;160(1):122-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.120. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
5
Generalized railway tank car safety design optimization for hazardous materials transport: addressing the trade-off between transportation efficiency and safety.通用铁路罐车危险货物运输安全设计优化:解决运输效率与安全之间的权衡。
J Hazard Mater. 2011 May 15;189(1-2):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.136. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
6
Freight-train derailment rates for railroad safety and risk analysis.铁路安全和风险分析中的货运列车脱轨率。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
7
Environmental risk analysis of hazardous material rail transportation.危险物品铁路运输的环境风险分析。
J Hazard Mater. 2014 Jan 15;264:560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.051. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
8
Probabilistic risk analysis of unit trains versus manifest trains for transporting hazardous materials.单元列车与整车列车运输危险货物的概率风险分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Mar;181:106950. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106950. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
9
Reducing the threat of in-transit derailments involving dangerous goods through effective placement along the train consist.通过在列车车辆中有效布置来降低涉及危险货物的运输过程中脱轨的威胁。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):613-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
10
Analysis of U.S. freight-train derailment severity using zero-truncated negative binomial regression and quantile regression.使用零截断负二项回归和分位数回归分析美国货运列车脱轨严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 May 22.