• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量美洛西林与三剂量头孢呋辛加甲硝唑用于大肠手术后伤口感染的预防

Single dose mezlocillin versus three dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole for the prophylaxis of wound infection after large bowel surgery.

作者信息

Stubbs R S, Griggs N J, Kelleher J P, Dickinson I K, Moat N, Rimmer D M

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 1987 May;9(3):285-90. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90126-5.

DOI:10.1016/0195-6701(87)90126-5
PMID:2886534
Abstract

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in 116 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery to compare single dose prophylaxis with mezlocillin to cefuroxime plus metronidazole in three doses. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of iv mezlocillin (5.0 g) or three doses of iv cefuroxime plus metronidazole at 8-hourly intervals. The first dose was given on the operating table. The overall wound infection rate in the mezlocillin treated patients (n = 54) was 30% and in the patients treated with cefuroxime plus metronidazole (n = 56) 25%. This difference is not statistically significant. When trivial wound infections were disregarded the wound infection rates were 11% and 16% respectively, which again was not statistically significant.

摘要

对116例连续接受结直肠手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,以比较单剂量美洛西林预防与三剂量头孢呋辛加甲硝唑预防的效果。患者被随机分为接受单剂量静脉注射美洛西林(5.0 g)或每8小时一次静脉注射三剂量头孢呋辛加甲硝唑。第一剂在手术台上给药。接受美洛西林治疗的患者(n = 54)的总体伤口感染率为30%,接受头孢呋辛加甲硝唑治疗的患者(n = 56)为25%。这种差异无统计学意义。当忽略轻微伤口感染时,伤口感染率分别为11%和16%,同样无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Single dose mezlocillin versus three dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole for the prophylaxis of wound infection after large bowel surgery.单剂量美洛西林与三剂量头孢呋辛加甲硝唑用于大肠手术后伤口感染的预防
J Hosp Infect. 1987 May;9(3):285-90. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90126-5.
2
A prospective randomized trial to compare triple dose mezlocillin with triple dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.一项前瞻性随机试验,比较三联剂量美洛西林与三联剂量头孢呋辛加甲硝唑在结直肠手术中作为预防用药的效果。
J Hosp Infect. 1988 Oct;12(3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90009-6.
3
A prospective randomized trial to compare mezlocillin and metronidazole with cefuroxime and metronidazole as prophylaxis in elective colorectal operations.一项前瞻性随机试验,比较美洛西林和甲硝唑与头孢呋辛和甲硝唑在择期结直肠手术中作为预防用药的效果。
J Hosp Infect. 1983 Dec;4(4):375-82. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(83)90008-7.
4
A trial of mezlocillin versus cefuroxime with or without metronidazole for the prevention of wound sepsis after biliary and gastrointestinal surgery.
J Hosp Infect. 1988 Oct;12(3):207-14. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90008-4.
5
Single dose cefotaxime plus metronidazole versus three dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre prospective randomised study.单剂量头孢噻肟联合甲硝唑与三剂量头孢呋辛联合甲硝唑用于结直肠手术预防伤口感染的多中心前瞻性随机研究。
BMJ. 1990 Jan 6;300(6716):18-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6716.18.
6
Prophylactic metronidazole with and without cefuroxime in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised double-blind study.择期结直肠手术中使用与不使用头孢呋辛的预防性甲硝唑治疗。一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1985 Apr;30(2):123-5.
7
Prospective randomized trial of single dose cefuroxime against mezlocillin in elective gastric surgery.
J Hosp Infect. 1984 Jun;5(2):200-4. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(84)90124-5.
8
Single dose metronidazole with and without cefuroxime in elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术中使用与不使用头孢呋辛的单剂量甲硝唑。
Br J Surg. 1983 Nov;70(11):668-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800701109.
9
Evaluation of mezlocillin in elective gastrointestinal surgery.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 May;11 Suppl C:65-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/11.suppl_c.65.
10
Cost-effectiveness of single dose cefotaxime plus metronidazole compared with three doses each of cefuroxime plus metronidazole for the prevention of wound infection after colorectal surgery.单剂量头孢噻肟加甲硝唑与三剂量头孢呋辛加甲硝唑预防结直肠手术后伤口感染的成本效益比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Dec;30(6):855-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.6.855.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses.用于预防手术部位感染的抗生素:单剂量与多剂量
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Dec;31(12):101800. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101800. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
Optimal timing for antimicrobial prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infections: a retrospective analysis of 531 patients.优化抗菌预防时机以降低手术部位感染:531 例患者的回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 9;13(1):9405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36588-1.
3
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.结直肠手术的抗菌预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD001181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub4.
4
Penicillins. A current review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use.青霉素。对其临床药理学和治疗用途的当前综述。
Drugs. 1993 Jun;45(6):866-894. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345060-00002.
5
Comparison of cefotaxime plus metronidazole versus cefoxitin for prevention of wound infection after abdominal surgery.头孢噻肟联合甲硝唑与头孢西丁预防腹部手术后伤口感染的比较。
World J Surg. 1995 Sep-Oct;19(5):680-6; discussion 686. doi: 10.1007/BF00295902.
6
Single dose cefotaxime plus metronidazole versus three dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre prospective randomised study.单剂量头孢噻肟联合甲硝唑与三剂量头孢呋辛联合甲硝唑用于结直肠手术预防伤口感染的多中心前瞻性随机研究。
BMJ. 1990 Jan 6;300(6716):18-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6716.18.