Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3549-1.
Throughout most of sub-Saharan Africa (and, indeed, most resource-limited areas), lack of death registries prohibits linkage of cancer diagnoses and precludes the most expeditious approach to determining cancer survival. Instead, estimation of cancer survival often uses clinical records, which have some mortality data but are replete with patients who are lost to follow-up (LTFU), some of which may be caused by undocumented death. The end result is that accurate estimation of cancer survival is rarely performed. A prominent example of a common cancer in Africa for which survival data are needed but for which frequent LTFU has precluded accurate estimation is Kaposi sarcoma (KS).
Using electronic records, we identified all newly diagnosed KS among HIV-infected adults at 33 primary care clinics in Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, and Malawi from 2009 to 2012. We determined those patients who were apparently LTFU, defined as absent from clinic for ≥90 days at database closure and unknown to be dead or transferred. Using standardized protocols which included manual chart review, telephone calls, and physical tracking in the community, we attempted to update vital status amongst patients who were LTFU.
We identified 1222 patients with KS, of whom 440 were LTFU according to electronic records. Manual chart review revealed that 18 (4.1%) were classified as LFTU due to clerical error, leaving 422 as truly LTFU. Of these 422, we updated vital status in 78%; manual chart review was responsible for updating in 5.7%, telephone calls in 26%, and physical tracking in 46%. Among 378 patients who consented at clinic enrollment to be tracked if they became LTFU and who had sufficient geographic contact/locator information, we updated vital status in 88%. Duration of LTFU was not associated with success of tracking, but tracking success was better in Kenya than the other sites.
It is feasible to update vital status in a large fraction of patients with HIV-associated KS in sub-Saharan Africa who have become LTFU from clinical care. This finding likely applies to other cancers as well. Updating vital status amongst lost patients paves the way towards accurate determination of cancer survival.
在撒哈拉以南非洲(以及确实是大多数资源有限的地区),缺乏死亡登记系统,这使得癌症诊断无法与死亡记录相关联,也无法采用最快捷的方法来确定癌症的生存率。相反,癌症生存率的估计通常使用临床记录,这些记录具有一些死亡率数据,但其中充斥着失访(LTFU)的患者,其中一些可能是由于未记录的死亡。最终的结果是,很少能够准确地估计癌症的生存率。一个突出的例子是,在非洲常见的一种癌症需要生存数据,但由于经常出现失访而无法准确估计,这种癌症就是卡波西肉瘤(KS)。
我们使用电子病历,确定了 2009 年至 2012 年间在肯尼亚、乌干达、尼日利亚和马拉维的 33 个初级保健诊所中,新诊断出的艾滋病毒感染者中的所有卡波西肉瘤病例。我们确定了那些显然失访的患者,这些患者定义为在数据库关闭时已经离开诊所 90 天以上且未知其死亡或转院的患者。我们使用标准化的协议,包括病历审查、电话联系和在社区中进行身体跟踪,尝试更新失访患者的生存状况。
我们确定了 1222 例卡波西肉瘤患者,其中 440 例根据电子记录显示为失访。病历审查显示,有 18 例(4.1%)因文书错误而被归类为失访,这使得真正失访的患者为 422 例。在这 422 例患者中,我们更新了 78%的患者的生存状况;病历审查负责更新 5.7%,电话联系负责更新 26%,身体跟踪负责更新 46%。在 378 例在诊所登记时同意如果失访将被跟踪的患者中,我们更新了 88%的患者的生存状况。失访时间的长短与跟踪成功率没有关系,但在肯尼亚,跟踪成功率高于其他地区。
在撒哈拉以南非洲的艾滋病毒相关卡波西肉瘤患者中,有很大一部分失访患者可以更新其生存状况,这是可行的。这一发现可能也适用于其他癌症。更新失访患者的生存状况为准确确定癌症的生存率铺平了道路。