Suppr超能文献

应对不良儿童和社区经历的新框架:建设社区恢复力模型。

A New Framework for Addressing Adverse Childhood and Community Experiences: The Building Community Resilience Model.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Sumner Redstone Global Center for Prevention and Wellness, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S86-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.011.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We propose a transformative approach to foster collaboration across child health, public health, and community-based agencies to address the root causes of toxic stress and childhood adversity and to build community resilience.

METHODS

Physicians, members of social service agencies, and experts in toxic stress and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) were interviewed to inform development of the Building Community Resilience (BCR) model. Through a series of key informant interviews and focus groups, we sought to understand the role of BCR for child health systems and their partners to reduce toxic stress and build community resilience to improve child health outcomes.

RESULTS

Key informants indicated the intentional approach to ACEs and toxic stress through continuous quality improvement (data-driven decisions and program development, partners testing and adapting to changes to their needs, and iterative development and testing) which provides a mechanism by which social determinants or a population health approach could be introduced to physicians and community partners as part of a larger effort to build community resilience. Structured interviews also reveal a need for a framework that provides guidance, structure, and support for child health systems and community partners to develop collective goals, shared work plans, and a means for data-sharing to reinforce the components that will contribute to community resilience.

CONCLUSIONS

Key informant interviews and focus group dialogues revealed a deep understanding of the factors related to toxic stress and ACEs. Respondents endorsed the BCR approach as a means to explore capacity issues, reduce fragmented health care delivery, and facilitate integrated systems across partners in efforts to build community resilience. Current financing models are seen as a potential barrier, because they often do not support restructured roles, partnership development, and the work to sustain upstream efforts to address toxic stress and community resilience.

摘要

目的

我们提出了一种变革性的方法,以促进儿童健康、公共卫生和基于社区的机构之间的合作,以解决有毒压力和儿童逆境的根本原因,并建立社区弹性。

方法

采访了医生、社会服务机构成员以及有毒压力和不良儿童经历(ACEs)方面的专家,为构建社区弹性(BCR)模型提供信息。通过一系列关键知情人访谈和焦点小组,我们试图了解 BCR 对儿童健康系统及其合作伙伴的作用,以减少有毒压力并建立社区弹性,从而改善儿童健康结果。

结果

关键知情人表示,通过持续质量改进(数据驱动的决策和方案制定、合作伙伴根据需要测试和适应变化,以及迭代开发和测试)来有意处理 ACEs 和有毒压力,这为将社会决定因素或人口健康方法引入医生和社区合作伙伴提供了一种机制,作为建立社区弹性的更大努力的一部分。结构化访谈还揭示了需要一个框架,为儿童健康系统和社区合作伙伴提供指导、结构和支持,以制定集体目标、共同工作计划以及数据共享的手段,以加强有助于社区弹性的组成部分。

结论

关键知情人访谈和焦点小组对话揭示了对有毒压力和 ACEs 相关因素的深刻理解。受访者认可 BCR 方法是探索能力问题、减少医疗服务分散以及促进合作伙伴之间综合系统的一种手段,以建立社区弹性。目前的融资模式被视为一个潜在的障碍,因为它们通常不支持重构角色、伙伴关系发展以及维持解决有毒压力和社区弹性的上游工作的工作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验