Choi Kristen R, Dunn Erin C, Comulada W Scott, Saadi Altaf
School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01883-7.
The purpose of this study was to: 1) examine the co-occurrence of household and community adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among preadolescent youth using latent class analysis (LCA), and 2) examine the association of ACE latent clusters to clinical-range scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Data came from the baseline and year 1 survey of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study with 10,915 youth recruited from school-based catchment areas in the United States. We used LCA to examine 6 types of household adversity and 7 types of community adversity, including 4 types of discrimination. We identified 5 latent classes of household/community ACEs. The class with high levels of household and community ACEs together was most strongly associated with clinical-range CBCL scores in adjusted models. Assessing adversity comprehensively may improve identification of youth with elevated risk for behavioral symptoms, who are greatest in need of intervention.
1)使用潜在类别分析(LCA)检查青春期前青少年家庭和社区不良童年经历(ACEs)的共现情况,以及2)检查ACE潜在类别与儿童行为检查表(CBCL)临床范围得分之间的关联。数据来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的基线和第1年调查,该研究从美国校本集水区招募了10,915名青少年。我们使用LCA检查了6种家庭逆境和7种社区逆境,包括4种歧视类型。我们确定了5种家庭/社区ACEs的潜在类别。在调整模型中,家庭和社区ACEs水平都高的类别与临床范围的CBCL得分关联最为强烈。全面评估逆境可能会改善对行为症状风险升高的青少年的识别,这些青少年最需要干预。