Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者中的应用比较。

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Medicine, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;249:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.030. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an important factor of adverse cardiovascular events in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors is associated with improved clinical outcomes, however, there are limited data comparing the effectiveness of two different RAAS inhibitors in STEMI patients with DM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS

A total of 3811 eligible STEMI patients with DM were enrolled in Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). They were stratified into two groups: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) group (n=2691) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) group (n=1120). To adjust baseline confounding factors, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and evaluated individual and composite major clinical outcomes between the two groups up to 2years.

RESULTS

After PSM, a total of 1049 well-matched pairs were generated. Baseline clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were not significantly different between the two groups up to 2years, CONCLUSION: In the present study, ACEI and ARB showed comparable effectiveness and safety on individual and composite clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with DM who underwent successful PCI with DES at least up to 2years.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)是急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者不良心血管事件的重要因素。肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂与改善临床结局相关,然而,在接受药物洗脱支架(DES)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 STEMI 合并 DM 患者中,比较两种不同 RAAS 抑制剂有效性的相关数据有限。

方法

共有 3811 名符合条件的 STEMI 合并 DM 患者被纳入韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究(KAMIR)。他们被分为两组:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)组(n=2691)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)组(n=1120)。为了调整基线混杂因素,我们进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,并在 2 年内评估了两组的个体和复合主要临床结局。

结果

PSM 后,共产生了 1049 对匹配良好的个体。两组的基线临床、血管造影和手术特征在两组之间平衡良好。两组在 2 年内的死亡、复发性心肌梗死(MI)、血运重建和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率均无显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,ACEI 和 ARB 在接受成功的 DES-PCI 的 STEMI 合并 DM 患者的个体和复合临床结局方面表现出相当的有效性和安全性,至少持续 2 年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验