El-Sayed Mohamed Lotfy Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa Abdo, Mansour Marwa Abdel Azim, Mansour Shymma Abdel Azim
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017 Oct;67(5):356-362. doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-1010-7. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of unilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling versus bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume in clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant PCOS patients in terms of endocrine changes, menstrual cycle resumption, ovulation and pregnancy rates.
This study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagazig university hospitals. One hundred CC-resistant PCOS patients were divided into two groups. Group (I) (50 patients) underwent unilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume (60 J/cm of ovarian tissue), and group (II) (50 patients) underwent bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling using the same previously mentioned thermal dose. Endocrinal changes and menstrual cycle resumption were assessed within 8 weeks postoperatively, but the ovulation and pregnancy rates were estimated after 6-month follow-up period.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups as regards demographic data ( > 0.05). As regards menstruation cycle resumption (62.5 vs. 81%) ( = 0.047), total ovulation rate (54.2 vs. 78.7%) ( = 0.011) and cumulative pregnancy rate (33.3 vs. 55.3%) ( = 0.031), there was statistically significant difference between both groups. After drilling, there were highly statistically significant decrease in the mean serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and significant decrease in the mean serum levels of testosterone in both groups. Mean serum level of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) did not change significantly in both groups after drilling.
Bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume is more effective than the right-sided unilateral technique with thermal dose adjusted according to ovarian volume in terms of menstrual cycle resumption, ovulation and cumulative pregnancy rates in CC-resistant PCOS patients.
本研究旨在评估在枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)抵抗的多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者中,根据卵巢体积调整热剂量的单侧腹腔镜卵巢打孔术与双侧腹腔镜卵巢打孔术在内分泌变化、月经周期恢复、排卵及妊娠率方面的疗效。
本研究在扎加齐格大学医院妇产科进行。100例CC抵抗的PCOS患者被分为两组。第一组(50例患者)接受根据卵巢体积调整热剂量(60 J/cm卵巢组织)的单侧腹腔镜卵巢打孔术,第二组(50例患者)接受使用上述相同热剂量的双侧腹腔镜卵巢打孔术。术后8周内评估内分泌变化和月经周期恢复情况,但排卵率和妊娠率在6个月随访期后进行评估。
两组在人口统计学数据方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。在月经周期恢复方面(62.5%对81%)(P=0.047)、总排卵率方面(54.2%对78.7%)(P=0.011)以及累积妊娠率方面(33.3%对55.3%)(P=0.031),两组之间存在统计学显著差异。打孔术后,两组的促黄体生成素(LH)平均血清水平均有高度统计学显著下降,睾酮平均血清水平均有显著下降。两组打孔术后促卵泡生成素(FSH)平均血清水平均无显著变化。
在CC抵抗的PCOS患者中,就月经周期恢复、排卵及累积妊娠率而言,根据卵巢体积调整热剂量的双侧腹腔镜卵巢打孔术比根据卵巢体积调整热剂量的右侧单侧技术更有效。