• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: findings from the PGen study.少数种族群体对直接面向消费者的基因检测的兴趣:PGen研究结果
J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0325-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的基因检测后遗传咨询的应用:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1270-1279. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0106-7. Epub 2017 May 16.
3
Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.澳大利亚人对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的知识和看法。
Intern Med J. 2014 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12289.
4
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.直接面向消费者的基因检测:用户动机、决策过程及对检测结果的感知效用
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.Impact of Personal Genomics(PGen)研究的设计、方法和参与者特征,这是一项针对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测客户的前瞻性队列研究。
Genome Med. 2014 Dec 3;6(12):96. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0096-0. eCollection 2014.
6
Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的处方药变化:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果。
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.141. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
7
Racial Disparities in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Have We Bridged the Gap?种族差异与分化型甲状腺癌:我们是否已经弥合了差距?
Thyroid. 2017 Jun;27(6):762-772. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0626. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测对乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌感知风险的影响:PGen研究结果
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Oct 15;8:63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0140-y.
9
Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.消费者对直接面向消费者的个人基因组测试后与初级保健提供者互动的看法。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22. doi: 10.7326/M15-0995. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
10
Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.癌症风险的个人基因组检测:来自个人基因组学研究影响的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):636-644. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1503. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and use of genetic testing: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey 2020.遗传检测的认知与使用:2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查分析。
Genet Med. 2022 Dec;24(12):2526-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.023. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
Video education about genetic privacy and patient perspectives about sharing prenatal genetic data: a randomized trial.关于遗传隐私和患者对分享产前遗传数据看法的视频教育:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):87.e1-87.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.047. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
3
Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.制定直接面向消费者的基因检测法规的考量:使用3-I框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2022 Apr;13(2):155-170. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide.与自杀遗传风险评分相关的伦理问题。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2021 Dec;186(8):433-444. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32871. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
"Being proactive, not reactive": exploring perceptions of genetic testing among White, Latinx, and Pacific Islander Populations.“积极主动,而非被动应对”:探究白人群体、拉丁裔群体和太平洋岛民群体对基因检测的看法。
J Community Genet. 2021 Oct;12(4):617-630. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00542-3. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.亚裔美国人的遗传咨询和检测:系统评价。
Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1424-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01169-y. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.非裔美国成年人对活体肾脏捐献和移植中使用载脂蛋白 L1(ApoL1)基因检测的看法。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1197-1205. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16206. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
8
Physician Experience with Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Kaiser Permanente.凯撒医疗集团中医生对直接面向消费者的基因检测的体验
J Pers Med. 2019 Nov 1;9(4):47. doi: 10.3390/jpm9040047.
9
Exploring Asian Indian views about cancer and participation in cancer research: an evaluation of a culturally tailored educational intervention.探索亚洲印度人对癌症的看法以及参与癌症研究的情况:对一种文化定制教育干预措施的评估。
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00436-5. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
10
Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.基于不相关法医和生物医学位点的亲属关联的统计检测。
Cell. 2018 Oct 18;175(3):848-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Planning for US Precision Medicine Initiative underway.美国精准医疗计划的规划正在进行中。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2448-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61124-2.
2
Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Findings from the 2013 U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知:来自2013年美国健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0784-x.
3
Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.Impact of Personal Genomics(PGen)研究的设计、方法和参与者特征,这是一项针对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测客户的前瞻性队列研究。
Genome Med. 2014 Dec 3;6(12):96. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0096-0. eCollection 2014.
4
Awareness of cancer susceptibility genetic testing: the 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys.癌症易感性基因检测认知情况:2000年、2005年及2010年国家健康访谈调查
Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.002.
5
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.直接面向消费者的基因检测与个人基因组学服务:近期实证研究综述
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2013 Sep;1(3):182-200. doi: 10.1007/s40142-013-0018-2.
6
Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates.提高公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认识:与医疗保健可及性、互联网使用及人口密度的相关性
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:309109. doi: 10.1155/2012/309109. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
7
Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice.从四个基于州的人口调查中了解公众对直接面向消费者的个人基因组测试的认识和使用情况,以及对临床和公共卫生实践的影响。
Genet Med. 2012 Oct;14(10):860-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.67. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
8
The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing.医疗政策和医疗体系不信任对基因检测意愿的影响。
Med Care. 2012 May;50(5):381-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824d748b.
9
Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.大型管理式医疗组织成员对直接面向消费者的基因检测及基因检测直接面向消费者广告的认知。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):448-61. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9477-3. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
10
Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.2007年健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)中直接面向消费者的基因检测知晓度的种族和民族差异:社会人口统计学和计算能力相关性
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):440-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9478-2. Epub 2012 Jan 21.

少数种族群体对直接面向消费者的基因检测的兴趣:PGen研究结果

Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: findings from the PGen study.

作者信息

Landry Latrice, Nielsen Daiva Elena, Carere Deanna Alexis, Roberts J Scott, Green Robert C

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0325-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-017-0325-5
PMID:28868574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5614887/
Abstract

There is little information regarding direct-to-consumer (DTC) personal genetic testing (PGT) in non-White racial minorities. Using a web-based survey, we compared the pretest interests and attitudes toward DTC-PGT of racial minority and White DTC-PGT customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics using chi-square tests and multinomial regression. Data were available for 1487 participants (1389 White, 44 Black, and 54 Asian). Survey responses were similar across racial groups, although a greater proportion of Blacks compared to Whites reported being "very interested" in genetic information related to traits (91.9 vs. 70.8%, p = 0.009). A greater proportion of Asians compared to Whites reported that a "very important" consideration for pursuing DTC-PGT was limited information about their family health history (58.0 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.002). While a number of significant differences between groups were observed in unadjusted analyses, they did not remain significant after adjustment. This study provides a preliminary view of the interests for purchasing DTC-PGT among customers with racial minority backgrounds.

摘要

关于非白人少数族裔直接面向消费者(DTC)的个人基因检测(PGT)的信息很少。我们通过一项基于网络的调查,使用卡方检验和多项回归比较了少数族裔和23andMe及Pathway Genomics的白人DTC-PGT客户在检测前对DTC-PGT的兴趣和态度。共有1487名参与者的数据可供分析(1389名白人、44名黑人、54名亚洲人)。不同种族群体的调查回复相似,不过与白人相比,更大比例的黑人表示对与性状相关的基因信息“非常感兴趣”(91.9%对70.8%,p = 0.009)。与白人相比,更大比例的亚洲人表示进行DTC-PGT的“一个非常重要”的考虑因素是关于其家族健康史的信息有限(58.0%对37.5%,p = 0.002)。虽然在未经调整的分析中观察到了组间的一些显著差异,但调整后这些差异不再显著。本研究初步呈现了少数族裔背景客户购买DTC-PGT的兴趣情况。