• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的处方药变化:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果。

Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

作者信息

Carere Deanna Alexis, VanderWeele Tyler J, Vassy Jason L, van der Wouden Cathelijne H, Roberts J Scott, Kraft Peter, Green Robert C

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.141. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2016.141
PMID:27657683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5362351/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To measure the frequency of prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (DTC-PGT) and their association with the pharmacogenomic results received.

METHODS

New DTC-PGT customers were enrolled in 2012 and completed surveys prior to the return of results and 6 months after results; DTC-PGT results were linked to survey data. "Atypical response" pharmacogenomic results were defined as those indicating an increase or decrease in risk of an adverse drug event or likelihood of therapeutic benefit. At follow-up, participants reported prescription medication changes and health-care provider consultation.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available from 961 participants, of whom 54 (5.6%) reported changing a medication they were taking or starting a new medication due to their DTC-PGT results. Of these, 45 (83.3%) reported consulting with a health-care provider regarding the change. Pharmacogenomic results were available for 961 participants, of which 875 (91.2%) received one or more atypical response results. For each such result received, the odds of reporting a prescription medication change increased 1.57 times (95% confidence interval = 1.17, 2.11).

CONCLUSION

Receipt of pharmacogenomic results indicating an atypical drug response is common with DTC-PGT and is associated with prescription medication changes; however, fewer than 1% of consumers report unsupervised changes at 6 months after testing.Genet Med advance online publication 22 September 2016.

摘要

目的

测量直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测(DTC - PGT)后处方药变更的频率及其与所获得的药物基因组学结果的关联。

方法

2012年招募了新的DTC - PGT客户,在结果返回之前和结果返回6个月后完成调查;DTC - PGT结果与调查数据相关联。“非典型反应”药物基因组学结果被定义为那些表明药物不良事件风险增加或降低或治疗获益可能性的结果。在随访中,参与者报告了处方药的变更和与医疗保健提供者的咨询情况。

结果

有961名参与者的随访数据可用,其中54名(5.6%)报告因DTC - PGT结果而改变了正在服用的药物或开始服用新药。在这些人中,45名(83.3%)报告就该变更咨询了医疗保健提供者。有961名参与者获得了药物基因组学结果,其中875名(91.2%)收到了一个或多个非典型反应结果。对于每一个这样的结果,报告处方药变更的几率增加了1.57倍(95%置信区间 = 1.17,2.11)。

结论

DTC - PGT中收到表明非典型药物反应的药物基因组学结果很常见,并且与处方药变更相关;然而,不到1%的消费者在检测后6个月报告了未经监督的变更。《基因医学》2016年9月22日在线优先发表。

相似文献

1
Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的处方药变化:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果。
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.141. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.消费者报告称,在进行直接面向消费者的个人基因检测后,他们对自身基因知识的信心有所下降。
Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.34. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
3
Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.消费者对直接面向消费者的个人基因组测试后与初级保健提供者互动的看法。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22. doi: 10.7326/M15-0995. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
4
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.直接面向消费者的基因检测:用户动机、决策过程及对检测结果的感知效用
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.癌症风险的个人基因组检测:来自个人基因组学研究影响的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):636-644. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1503. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
6
Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的饮食和运动变化。
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 May 2;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0258-1.
7
The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测对乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌感知风险的影响:PGen研究结果
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Oct 15;8:63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0140-y.
8
Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的基因检测后遗传咨询的应用:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1270-1279. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0106-7. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.从期望到体验:个人基因组测试中的消费者自主性和选择。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1701583. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
10
Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.澳大利亚人对围绕个人基因检测使用的支持的看法:来自Genioz研究的结果。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing.感知到的理解与心理社会结果:员工对职场基因检测学习结果的反应
Per Med. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003.
2
Assessing the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of primary care clinicians toward pharmacogenetics.评估初级保健临床医生对药物遗传学的知识、认知和实践。
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2021 Jan;4(1):27-32. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1341. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system.大型美国医疗机构开展工作场所基因检测后的医疗保健利用和行为变化。
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Should Commercial Diagnostic Testing Be Stimulated or Discouraged? Analyzing Willingness-to-Pay and Market Externalities of Three Commercial Diagnostic Tests in The Netherlands.是否应该刺激或抑制商业诊断检测?荷兰三种商业诊断检测的支付意愿和市场外部性分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Mar;22(2):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00846-0. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
A randomized controlled trial of analogue pharmacogenomic testing feedback for psychotropic medications.一项关于精神药物类似物药物基因组学检测反馈的随机对照试验。
PEC Innov. 2022 Dec 16;2:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100119. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Whole-genome sequencing as an investigational device for return of hereditary disease risk and pharmacogenomic results as part of the All of Us Research Program.全基因组测序作为一种研究设备,用于遗传性疾病风险和药物基因组学结果的返还,作为“我们所有人”研究计划的一部分。
Genome Med. 2022 Mar 28;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01031-z.
7
Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.家庭秘密:参与直接面向消费者的基因亲属寻找服务的体验和结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar 3;109(3):486-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.制定直接面向消费者的基因检测法规的考量:使用3-I框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2022 Apr;13(2):155-170. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
An Analysis of Pharmacogenomic-Guided Pathways and Their Effect on Medication Changes and Hospital Admissions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物基因组学指导途径及其对药物变更和住院影响的分析:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Genet. 2021 Jul 30;12:698148. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.698148. eCollection 2021.
10
May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach.直接面向消费者的基因检测会对全科医生的日常实践产生影响吗?一项针对患者对此方法意向的横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 26;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01428-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.Impact of Personal Genomics(PGen)研究的设计、方法和参与者特征,这是一项针对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测客户的前瞻性队列研究。
Genome Med. 2014 Dec 3;6(12):96. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0096-0. eCollection 2014.
2
Evidence required to demonstrate clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing: the debate continues.证明药物遗传学检测临床实用性所需的证据:争议仍在继续。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Dec;96(6):655-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.185.
3
SLCO1B1 Polymorphisms and Statin-Induced Myopathy.SLCO1B1基因多态性与他汀类药物所致肌病
PLoS Curr. 2013 Dec 4;5:ecurrents.eogt.d21e7f0c58463571bb0d9d3a19b82203. doi: 10.1371/currents.eogt.d21e7f0c58463571bb0d9d3a19b82203.
4
Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation.直接面向消费者的药物基因组检测与医生利用率的提高有关。
J Med Genet. 2014 Feb;51(2):83-9. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
5
Thrombophilia testing in women with venous thrombosis: the 4 P's approach.静脉血栓形成女性的血栓形成倾向检测:4P方法
Clin Chem. 2014 Jan;60(1):134-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.202648. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
Clinically actionable genotypes among 10,000 patients with preemptive pharmacogenomic testing.10000 例患者进行药物基因组学检测的临床可操作基因型。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Apr;95(4):423-31. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.229. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
7
PharmGKB: the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base.药物基因组学知识库(PharmGKB)
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1015:311-20. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-435-7_20.
8
Health, behavior, and health care disparities: disentangling the effects of income and race in the United States.健康、行为和医疗保健差距:解析美国收入和种族的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(4):607-25. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.4.c.
9
Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing.医疗服务利用与多重基因检测的关联。
Genet Med. 2012 Oct;14(10):852-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.52. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.风险业务:直接面向消费者的个人基因检测客户的风险认知与医疗服务使用情况
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):413-22. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26.