• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚裔美国人的遗传咨询和检测:系统评价。

Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.

机构信息

Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, CA, USA.

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1424-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01169-y. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-021-01169-y
PMID:33972720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11973605/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Asian Americans have been understudied in the literature on genetic and genomic services. The current study systematically identified, evaluated, and summarized findings from relevant qualitative and quantitative studies on genetic health care for Asian Americans.

METHODS

A search of five databases (1990 to 2018) returned 8,522 unique records. After removing duplicates, abstract/title screening, and full text review, 47 studies met inclusion criteria. Data from quantitative studies were converted into "qualitized data" and pooled together with thematic data from qualitative studies to produce a set of integrated findings.

RESULTS

Synthesis of results revealed that (1) Asian Americans are under-referred but have high uptake for genetic services, (2) linguistic/communication challenges were common and Asian Americans expected more directive genetic counseling, and (3) Asian Americans' family members were involved in testing decisions, but communication of results and risk information to family members was lower than other racial groups.

CONCLUSION

This study identified multiple barriers to genetic counseling, testing, and care for Asian Americans, as well as gaps in the research literature. By focusing on these barriers and filling these gaps, clinical genetic approaches can be tailored to meet the needs of diverse patient groups, particularly those of Asian descent.

摘要

目的

在关于遗传和基因组服务的文献中,亚洲裔美国人的研究相对较少。本研究系统地确定、评估并总结了有关亚洲裔美国人遗传保健的定性和定量研究的发现。

方法

在五个数据库(1990 年至 2018 年)中进行搜索,共返回 8522 个独特记录。在去除重复项、摘要/标题筛选和全文审查后,有 47 项研究符合纳入标准。定量研究的数据被转化为“定性化数据”,并与定性研究的主题数据合并,以产生一套综合发现。

结果

综合结果表明:(1)亚洲裔美国人被转介的比例较低,但对遗传服务的接受程度较高;(2)语言/沟通方面的挑战很常见,亚洲裔美国人希望得到更具指导意义的遗传咨询;(3)亚洲裔美国人的家庭成员参与了检测决策,但向家庭成员传达检测结果和风险信息的程度低于其他种族群体。

结论

本研究确定了亚洲裔美国人在遗传咨询、检测和护理方面存在多种障碍,以及研究文献中的空白。通过关注这些障碍和填补这些空白,临床遗传方法可以根据不同患者群体的需求进行调整,特别是那些亚裔患者。

相似文献

1
Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.亚裔美国人的遗传咨询和检测:系统评价。
Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1424-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01169-y. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
'If I Knew More… I Would Feel Less Worried': Filipino Americans' Attitudes and Knowledge of Genetic Disease, Counseling, and Testing.“如果我知道更多……我就不会那么担心了”:菲律宾裔美国人对遗传疾病、咨询和检测的态度和了解。
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):35-44. doi: 10.1159/000536173. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Latinx individuals' knowledge of, preferences for, and experiences with prenatal genetic testing: a scoping review.拉丁裔个体对产前基因检测的了解、偏好和体验:范围综述。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01438-2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Chinese Americans' Use of Patient Portal Systems: Scoping Review.华裔美国人对患者门户网站系统的使用:范围综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e27924. doi: 10.2196/27924.
7
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
8
Health Disparities Across Lung Cancer Continuum Among Asian Americans: A Systematic Review.亚裔美国人肺癌连续过程中的健康差异:一项系统综述。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Apr;24(2):526-545. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01212-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Chinese Americans' views of prenatal genetic testing in the genomic era: a qualitative study.中文标题: 基因组时代美籍华人对产前基因检测的看法:一项定性研究
Clin Genet. 2012 Jul;82(1):22-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01871.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
10
End-of-Life Care for People With Cancer From Ethnic Minority Groups: A Systematic Review.少数民族癌症患者的临终关怀:一项系统评价。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Apr;33(3):291-305. doi: 10.1177/1049909114565658. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental knowledge and attitudes toward genetic counseling and childhood genetic testing for congenital anomalies in Qatar.卡塔尔父母对先天性异常的遗传咨询和儿童基因检测的了解与态度。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70096. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70096.
2
Interpretative phenomenological analysis and genetic counseling.诠释现象学分析与遗传咨询
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70061. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70061.
3
Assessing the prevalence of unmet need for genetic counseling in Canada and exploring associations with sociodemographic factors.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics.基因组学前沿改善人类健康的战略愿景。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):683-692. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2817-4. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Barriers to the utilization of genetic testing and genetic counseling in patients with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancers.疑似遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者在基因检测和遗传咨询利用方面的障碍。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Jun 11;32(3):340-344. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1612702. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Trends in Clinical Research Including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Participants Funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 1992 to 2018.
评估加拿大未满足的遗传咨询需求的患病率,并探索其与社会人口学因素的关联。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 May;33(5):633-641. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01812-1. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
4
Evaluating genetic counseling session duration: A scoping review of patient care time, influencing factors, and impact on patient outcomes.评估遗传咨询会话时长:对患者护理时间、影响因素及对患者结局影响的范围综述。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e1999. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1999. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
5
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.精神医学中数字化表型研究的个体研究结果回报。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Feb;24(2):69-90. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2180109. Epub 2023 May 8.
6
Psychiatric genomics, mental health equity, and intersectionality: A framework for research and practice.精神科基因组学、心理健康公平性与交叉性:一个研究与实践的框架
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 21;13:1061705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1061705. eCollection 2022.
7
Latinx attitudes, barriers, and experiences with genetic counseling and testing: A systematic review.拉丁裔对遗传咨询和检测的态度、障碍和体验:系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):166-181. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1632. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
Editorial: Community Engagement Is Key to Promoting Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Health.社论:社区参与是促进亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民健康的关键。
Health Equity. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):681-683. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0124. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessing Vietnamese American patient perspectives on population genetic testing in primary care: A community-engaged approach.评估越南裔美国患者对初级保健中群体基因检测的看法:一种社区参与式方法。
HGG Adv. 2022 Aug 6;3(4):100134. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100134. eCollection 2022 Oct 13.
10
Genetic Referral Patterns and Responses to Clinical Scenarios: A Survey of Primary Care Providers and Clinical Geneticists.遗传咨询模式和临床情况应对:基层医疗照护提供者和临床遗传学家的调查。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211046734. doi: 10.1177/21501327211046734.
1992 年至 2018 年美国国立卫生研究院资助的包括亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民参与者在内的临床研究趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197432. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7432.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review.美国在基因检测知识和态度方面的种族与民族差异:系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):587-601. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1078. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
To Tell or Not: The Chinese Doctors' Dilemma on Disclosure of a Cancer Diagnosis to the Patient.告知还是不告知:中国医生在向患者披露癌症诊断时的两难困境。
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Nov;47(11):1773-1774.
6
Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: A pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication.精准医学时代的有效沟通:针对健康素养低的患者进行的一项改善遗传咨询沟通的试点干预措施。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):357-367. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.癌症基因检测的心理社会和行为结果:系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;27(1):28-35. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0257-5. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
8
Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.评估美国人群的基因素养意识和知识差距:健康信息国家趋势调查结果
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(6):343-348. doi: 10.1159/000489117. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Disparities in genetics assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Can we do better?卵巢癌女性遗传评估中的差异:我们能否做得更好?
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Apr;149(1):84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.034.
10
Patient communication of cancer genetic test results in a diverse population.在不同人群中进行癌症基因检测结果的患者沟通。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):85-94. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx010.