Suppr超能文献

养老院居民中预防心血管药物的使用情况。可否减少用药?SHELTER 研究。

Prevalence of Preventive Cardiovascular Medication Use In Nursing Home Residents. Room for Deprescribing? The SHELTER Study.

机构信息

VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine at EMGO+ and Amsterdam Public Health Institutes, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Nursing Home, Amaris Zorggroep, Hilversum, The Netherlands.

VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine at EMGO+ and Amsterdam Public Health Institutes, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1037-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In nursing home (NH) residents with a very short life expectancy, the benefits of preventive cardiovascular medication maintenance are questionable.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of 4 classes of preventive cardiovascular medication (PCM) in NH residents, and to explore differences of prevalence across length of stay, mortality risk, cognitive impairment, functional disability, and across countries.

METHODS

A 12-month prospective cohort study was conducted in 57 NHs in 8 countries (Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, and Israel). We assessed the prevalence at first measurement of 4 classes of PCM: oral anticoagulants (OAC), platelet aggregation inhibitor (PAI), antihypertensive (AHT), and lipid-modifying agent (LMA), in older (60+ years) residents with valid medication assessments. The PCM prevalence was compared across the length of stay (short <60 days, mid, long >12 months), health instability as defined by Changes in Health, End-Stage Disease, Signs, and Symptoms Scale (CHESS) > 3, cognitive impairment by Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) > 2, and functional disability was measured using the Activities of Daily Living Hierarchy Scale (ADLH) ≥5.

RESULTS

Of the 3759 eligible residents, 2175 (57.9%) used at least 1 PCM. The prevalence of the 4 groups of PCM: OAC, PAI, AHT and LMA were 5.6%, 34.9%, 35.7%, and 10.4%, respectively. PCM use was lower in long-stay residents versus mid-stay: 56.0% vs. 62.7%, in cognitively impaired residents (47.1% vs. 67%), in residents with a high mortality risk (47.4% vs. 58.6%), and in residents with a high ADLH score (48.6% vs 64.0%).

CONCLUSION

Although the prevalence of PCM use was lower in long-stay, cognitively impaired residents, persons with a high mortality risk, and residents with more functional disabilities, there seems to be room for deprescribing.

摘要

简介

在预期寿命极短的养老院(NH)居民中,预防性心血管药物维持的益处值得怀疑。

目的

评估 NH 居民 4 类预防性心血管药物(PCM)的使用情况,并探讨其在入住时间、死亡率风险、认知障碍、功能障碍以及国家之间的差异。

方法

在 8 个国家(捷克共和国、英国、芬兰、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰和以色列)的 57 个 NH 中进行了为期 12 个月的前瞻性队列研究。我们评估了首次测量时 4 类 PCM 的使用情况:口服抗凝剂(OAC)、血小板聚集抑制剂(PAI)、抗高血压药(AHT)和调脂药(LMA),并在有有效药物评估的 60 岁以上(60+岁)的老年居民中进行了评估。根据健康变化、终末期疾病、症状和体征量表(CHESS)>3,认知功能障碍使用认知表现量表(CPS)>2,功能障碍使用日常生活活动等级量表(ADLH)≥5,将 PCM 的使用情况与入住时间(短<60 天,中,长>12 个月)、健康不稳定进行比较。

结果

在 3759 名符合条件的居民中,有 2175 名(57.9%)至少使用了 1 种 PCM。4 组 PCM:OAC、PAI、AHT 和 LMA 的患病率分别为 5.6%、34.9%、35.7%和 10.4%。与中程组相比,长期入住居民的 PCM 使用率较低:56.0% vs. 62.7%,认知障碍居民(47.1% vs. 67%),死亡率高的居民(47.4% vs. 58.6%),ADLH 评分较高的居民(48.6% vs 64.0%)。

结论

尽管长期入住、认知障碍、死亡率高和功能障碍严重的居民中 PCM 的使用频率较低,但似乎仍有减药空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验