VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine at EMGO+ and Amsterdam Public Health Institutes, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Nursing Home, Amaris Zorggroep, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine at EMGO+ and Amsterdam Public Health Institutes, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1037-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
In nursing home (NH) residents with a very short life expectancy, the benefits of preventive cardiovascular medication maintenance are questionable.
To assess the prevalence of 4 classes of preventive cardiovascular medication (PCM) in NH residents, and to explore differences of prevalence across length of stay, mortality risk, cognitive impairment, functional disability, and across countries.
A 12-month prospective cohort study was conducted in 57 NHs in 8 countries (Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, and Israel). We assessed the prevalence at first measurement of 4 classes of PCM: oral anticoagulants (OAC), platelet aggregation inhibitor (PAI), antihypertensive (AHT), and lipid-modifying agent (LMA), in older (60+ years) residents with valid medication assessments. The PCM prevalence was compared across the length of stay (short <60 days, mid, long >12 months), health instability as defined by Changes in Health, End-Stage Disease, Signs, and Symptoms Scale (CHESS) > 3, cognitive impairment by Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) > 2, and functional disability was measured using the Activities of Daily Living Hierarchy Scale (ADLH) ≥5.
Of the 3759 eligible residents, 2175 (57.9%) used at least 1 PCM. The prevalence of the 4 groups of PCM: OAC, PAI, AHT and LMA were 5.6%, 34.9%, 35.7%, and 10.4%, respectively. PCM use was lower in long-stay residents versus mid-stay: 56.0% vs. 62.7%, in cognitively impaired residents (47.1% vs. 67%), in residents with a high mortality risk (47.4% vs. 58.6%), and in residents with a high ADLH score (48.6% vs 64.0%).
Although the prevalence of PCM use was lower in long-stay, cognitively impaired residents, persons with a high mortality risk, and residents with more functional disabilities, there seems to be room for deprescribing.
在预期寿命极短的养老院(NH)居民中,预防性心血管药物维持的益处值得怀疑。
评估 NH 居民 4 类预防性心血管药物(PCM)的使用情况,并探讨其在入住时间、死亡率风险、认知障碍、功能障碍以及国家之间的差异。
在 8 个国家(捷克共和国、英国、芬兰、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰和以色列)的 57 个 NH 中进行了为期 12 个月的前瞻性队列研究。我们评估了首次测量时 4 类 PCM 的使用情况:口服抗凝剂(OAC)、血小板聚集抑制剂(PAI)、抗高血压药(AHT)和调脂药(LMA),并在有有效药物评估的 60 岁以上(60+岁)的老年居民中进行了评估。根据健康变化、终末期疾病、症状和体征量表(CHESS)>3,认知功能障碍使用认知表现量表(CPS)>2,功能障碍使用日常生活活动等级量表(ADLH)≥5,将 PCM 的使用情况与入住时间(短<60 天,中,长>12 个月)、健康不稳定进行比较。
在 3759 名符合条件的居民中,有 2175 名(57.9%)至少使用了 1 种 PCM。4 组 PCM:OAC、PAI、AHT 和 LMA 的患病率分别为 5.6%、34.9%、35.7%和 10.4%。与中程组相比,长期入住居民的 PCM 使用率较低:56.0% vs. 62.7%,认知障碍居民(47.1% vs. 67%),死亡率高的居民(47.4% vs. 58.6%),ADLH 评分较高的居民(48.6% vs 64.0%)。
尽管长期入住、认知障碍、死亡率高和功能障碍严重的居民中 PCM 的使用频率较低,但似乎仍有减药空间。