Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 282 Washington St, Hartford, CT 06106.
University of Connecticut, 375 Astor Drive, Sayville, NY 11782.
Spine J. 2018 Apr;18(4):648-654. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.253. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Many pelvic fixation options exist for posterior spinal fusion of pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis, including standard iliac screws (SISs) or a more recently introduced S2-Alar (S2A) technique. However, little data exist comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes of these techniques.
This study aimed to dentify differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis patients treated with SIS or S2A pelvic fixation.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective cohort study at a pediatric orthopedic clinic.
Patients aged 8-19 years undergoing posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis for neuromuscular scoliosis using SIS or S2A technique, with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level 4 or 5 were included.
Postoperative complication rates associated with pelvic fixation method were the outcome measures.
Charts and radiographs were reviewed for demographics, intra- and postoperative course, levels of instrumentation, operative correction, and implant failure (IF). Postoperative complications were classified according to the Accordion scale.
We studied 50 patients (28 SIS, 22 S2A) aged 14.0±2.8 years and an average follow-up of 3.5±1.7 years. The average number of levels fused was 16.5±1.1 with an average curve correction of 48°±21° postoperatively. A significant difference in radiographic IF rates was noted between SIS and S2A groups (57% vs. 27%, p=.02). No difference was noted between groups for frequency or severity of postoperative complications, inclusive of wound infections. Subgroup analysis demonstrated equivalent IF rates when comparing the S2A group with the SIS group with cross-links.
The S2A group generally demonstrated improved rates of radiographic IF compared with the SIS group, but the rates became equivalent when a cross-link was added to an SIS construct. Further, no difference in postoperative complication rates were identified between SIS and S2A groups.
对于儿童神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸的后路脊柱融合,有多种骨盆固定选择,包括标准髂骨螺钉(SIS)或最近引入的 S2-髂翼(S2A)技术。然而,比较这些技术的临床和影像学结果的数据很少。
本研究旨在确定使用 SIS 或 S2A 骨盆固定治疗儿童神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸患者的临床和影像学结果的差异。
研究设计/设置:这是一家儿科骨科诊所的回顾性队列研究。
纳入年龄在 8-19 岁之间,因神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸接受后路脊柱融合至骨盆,采用 SIS 或 S2A 技术,格拉斯哥-马里博尔运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)水平为 4 或 5 级的患者。
骨盆固定方法相关的术后并发症发生率是结果测量指标。
对图表和 X 光片进行回顾,以获取人口统计学、围手术期过程、器械水平、手术矫正和植入物失败(IF)等信息。术后并发症根据 Accordion 量表进行分类。
我们研究了 50 名患者(28 名 SIS,22 名 S2A),年龄为 14.0±2.8 岁,平均随访时间为 3.5±1.7 年。平均融合节段数为 16.5±1.1 个,术后平均曲线矫正为 48°±21°。SIS 和 S2A 组的影像学 IF 发生率存在显著差异(57% vs. 27%,p=.02)。两组在术后并发症的频率或严重程度方面,包括伤口感染,均无差异。亚组分析表明,当将交叉固定器添加到 SIS 结构中时,S2A 组与 SIS 组的 IF 发生率相当。
与 SIS 组相比,S2A 组一般表现出更高的影像学 IF 发生率,但当在 SIS 结构中添加交叉固定器时,发生率相当。此外,SIS 和 S2A 组之间未发现术后并发症发生率的差异。