Department of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre/Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e015379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015379.
Clinical guidelines have been recognised as an effective way to improve healthcare performance. However, little is known about the uptake and implementation of guidelines by general practitioners in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the guideline use behaviours and needs of practitioners in primary care settings in China.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2015 to May 2016 that included practitioners at 268 institutions in 15 provinces in China. Questionnaire development was informed by the execution of a literature review and consultation of experts. On-site surveys were implemented using a paper questionnaire to minimise missing responses. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with provider knowledge of and attitudes towards clinical guidelines.
Of the respondents, 91.7% (1568/1708) were aware of clinical guidelines, but only 11.3% (177/1568) frequently used them. The main mechanism by which primary care practitioners accessed guidelines was public search engines (63.4%; 911/1438), and practitioners seldom reported using biomedical databases. The most frequently identified barriers to guideline use were lack of training (49.9%; 778/1560), lack of access (44.6%; 696/1560) and lack of awareness (38.0%; 592/1560). Less than one-quarter of respondents considered current guidelines 'entirely appropriate' for use in primary care (23.5%; 339/1442). Most participants (96.2%; 1509/1568) believed it was necessary to develop primary care guidelines. Provider attitudes towards current guidelines were associated with the location and level of the institution and professional title of the practitioner (p<0.05).
Our survey revealed poor knowledge and uptake of clinical guidelines in primary care, and we identified a gap between the needs of practitioners and availability of clinical guidelines for use in primary care in China. In addition, lacking access to and training in guidelines also prevented primary healthcare practitioners from using guidelines in daily practice.
临床指南已被认为是改善医疗保健效果的有效方法。然而,对于中国全科医生对指南的采用和实施情况知之甚少。本研究旨在调查中国基层医疗机构医生的指南使用行为和需求。
我们于 2015 年 12 月至 2016 年 5 月进行了一项横断面调查,调查对象包括中国 15 个省 268 家机构的医生。问卷的制定是基于文献回顾和专家咨询。现场调查采用纸质问卷进行,以尽量减少漏答。采用多变量 logistic 回归分析确定与提供者对临床指南的了解和态度相关的因素。
在应答者中,91.7%(1568/1708)知晓临床指南,但只有 11.3%(177/1568)经常使用。基层医疗保健从业者获取指南的主要机制是公共搜索引擎(63.4%;911/1438),从业者很少报告使用生物医学数据库。使用指南的最常见障碍是缺乏培训(49.9%;778/1560)、缺乏获取途径(44.6%;696/1560)和缺乏认识(38.0%;592/1560)。不到四分之一的受访者认为当前的指南“完全适合”基层医疗使用(23.5%;339/1442)。大多数参与者(96.2%;1509/1568)认为有必要制定基层医疗保健指南。提供者对当前指南的态度与机构的位置和级别以及从业者的职称有关(p<0.05)。
我们的调查显示,中国基层医疗保健中临床指南的知识和采用率都很低,我们发现从业者的需求与中国基层医疗保健中可用的临床指南之间存在差距。此外,缺乏获取和培训指南也阻碍了基层医疗保健从业者在日常实践中使用指南。