• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿随机对照试验的未发表及中止情况。

Nonpublication and discontinuation of randomised controlled trials in newborns.

作者信息

Rüegger Christoph M, Dawson Jennifer A, Donath Susan M, Owen Louise S, Davis Peter G

机构信息

Newborn Research Centre and Neonatal Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Newborn Research, Department of Neonatology, University Hospital and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2017 Dec;106(12):1940-1944. doi: 10.1111/apa.14062. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1111/apa.14062
PMID:28871629
Abstract

AIM

To determine the rate of nonpublication and discontinuation of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in newborns.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of RCTs registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) between 2008 and 2012.

RESULTS

Fifty trials were identified, of which 23 (46%) were retrospectively registered. Thirty trials (60%) were published. After a median follow-up of 8.0 (range 4.6-17.4) years from Research Ethics Committee approval, 15 of 41 completed trials (37%) remained unpublished, representing 5422 neonatal trial participants. Nine trials (18%) were discontinued, including four that were published. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (n = 4). Sample size discrepancies between registration and publication were found in 17 (65%) of the 26 completed, published trials. In nine (35%) of these trials, the calculated sample size in the method section of the published article differed from the planned sample size in the trial registry (relative difference -20% to +33%).

CONCLUSION

Nonpublication and discontinuation of RCTs conducted in newborns is common. Additional efforts are needed to minimise the number of neonatal trial participants that are exposed to interventions without subsequent publication.

摘要

目的

确定新生儿随机对照试验(RCT)的未发表率和中止率。

方法

这是一项对2008年至2012年间在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)注册的RCT进行的回顾性横断面研究。

结果

共识别出50项试验,其中23项(46%)为回顾性注册。30项试验(60%)已发表。从研究伦理委员会批准起,经过中位数为8.0(范围4.6 - 17.4)年的随访,41项完成的试验中有15项(37%)仍未发表,涉及5422名新生儿试验参与者。9项试验(18%)被中止,其中4项已发表。中止的最常见原因是招募困难(n = 4)。在26项已完成并发表的试验中,有17项(65%)发现注册与发表之间存在样本量差异。在其中9项(35%)试验中,发表文章方法部分计算的样本量与试验注册计划的样本量不同(相对差异 -20%至 +33%)。

结论

新生儿RCT的未发表和中止情况很常见。需要做出更多努力,以尽量减少在未后续发表的情况下接受干预的新生儿试验参与者数量。

相似文献

1
Nonpublication and discontinuation of randomised controlled trials in newborns.新生儿随机对照试验的未发表及中止情况。
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Dec;106(12):1940-1944. doi: 10.1111/apa.14062. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Randomized Clinical Trials Conducted in Children.针对儿童开展的随机临床试验的中止与未发表情况。
Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0223. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Rates of Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Head and Neck Cancer Randomized Clinical Trials.头颈部癌症随机临床试验的停药和不发表率。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Feb 1;146(2):176-182. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.3967.
4
Premature trial discontinuation often not accurately reflected in registries: comparison of registry records with publications.过早试验终止情况在注册库中往往未得到准确反映:注册库记录与出版物的比较
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;81:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
5
Nonregistration, discontinuation, and nonpublication of randomized trials: A repeated metaresearch analysis.未注册、中止和不发表随机试验:一项重复的荟萃分析研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Apr 27;19(4):e1003980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003980. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Discontinuation and nonpublication of pediatric otolaryngology clinical trials.儿科耳鼻喉科临床试验的中止与未发表
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;151:110972. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110972. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Completion and Publication Rates of Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery: An Empirical Study.手术随机对照试验的完成率和发表率:一项实证研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000810.
8
Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study.外科随机对照试验的终止与未发表:观察性研究
BMJ. 2014 Dec 9;349:g6870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6870.
9
Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.停止的随机试验的流行率、特征和发表情况。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1045-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1361.
10
Noncompletion and nonpublication of trials studying rare diseases: A cross-sectional analysis.罕见病研究试验的完成和发表情况:一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 21;16(11):e1002966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002966. eCollection 2019 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to publication for results of clinical trials.临床试验结果的发表时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;11(11):MR000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub3.
2
Quality assessment of paediatric randomized controlled trials published in China from 1999 to 2022: a cross-sectional study.1999 年至 2022 年中国发表的儿科随机对照试验的质量评价:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 May 27;24(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04839-3.
3
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
评估研究注册与出版物之间差异的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 4;13(10):e076264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076264.
4
Fake news and fake research: Why meta-research matters more than ever.虚假新闻与虚假研究:为何元研究比以往任何时候都更重要。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Dec;56(12):1868-1871. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15237. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Noncompletion and nonpublication of trials studying rare diseases: A cross-sectional analysis.罕见病研究试验的完成和发表情况:一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 21;16(11):e1002966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002966. eCollection 2019 Nov.