Suppr超能文献

虚假新闻与虚假研究:为何元研究比以往任何时候都更重要。

Fake news and fake research: Why meta-research matters more than ever.

作者信息

McGee Richard G, Dawson Amanda C

机构信息

The Central Coast Clinical School, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Paediatrics, Gosford Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Dec;56(12):1868-1871. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15237. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Abstract

Research is in a crisis of credibility, and this is to the peril of all paediatricians. Billions of dollars are being wasted each year because research is not planned, badly conducted or poorly reported, and this is on a background of rapidly reducing research budgets. How can paediatricians, families and patients make informed treatment choices if the evidence base is absent or not trustworthy? This article discusses why meta-research now matters more than ever, how it can help solve this crisis of credibility and how this should lead to more efficient and effective clinical care. The field of meta-research or research-on-research is the ultimate big picture approach to identifying and solving issues of bias, error, misconduct and waste in research. Meta-researchers value authenticity over aesthetics and quality over quantity. The utility of meta-research does not rely on accusations or critical assessments of individual research, but through highlighting where and how the scientific method and research standards across all fields can be improved. Meta-researchers study, analyse and critique the research pathway, focusing on elements such as methods (how to conduct), evaluation (how to test), reporting (how to communicate), reproducibility (how to verify) and incentives (how to reward). In the current climate it is now more critical than ever that we make use of meta-research and prioritise high-quality high-impact research, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

摘要

研究正面临着可信度危机,这对所有儿科医生来说都是危险的。由于研究缺乏规划、执行不当或报告不佳,每年有数十亿美元被浪费,而这是在研究预算迅速减少的背景下发生的。如果缺乏证据基础或证据不可靠,儿科医生、家庭和患者如何做出明智的治疗选择?本文讨论了为什么元研究现在比以往任何时候都更重要,它如何有助于解决这种可信度危机,以及这将如何带来更高效、更有效的临床护理。元研究或研究之研究领域是识别和解决研究中的偏见、错误、不当行为和浪费问题的终极宏观方法。元研究人员重视真实性而非美观性,重视质量而非数量。元研究的效用并不依赖于对个别研究的指责或批判性评估,而是通过突出所有领域的科学方法和研究标准在哪些方面以及如何能够得到改进。元研究人员研究、分析和批判研究路径,关注方法(如何进行)、评估(如何测试)、报告(如何交流)、可重复性(如何验证)和激励措施(如何奖励)等要素。在当前形势下,利用元研究并优先开展高质量、高影响力的研究比以往任何时候都更加关键,最终实现改善患者治疗效果的目标。

相似文献

1
Fake news and fake research: Why meta-research matters more than ever.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Dec;56(12):1868-1871. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15237. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Can Media Literacy Intervention Improve Fake News Credibility Assessment? A Meta-Analysis.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024 Apr;27(4):240-252. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0324. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
Span J Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;24:e25. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.23.
4
Fake News: A Technological Approach to Proving the Origins of Content, Using Blockchains.
Big Data. 2017 Dec;5(4):356-371. doi: 10.1089/big.2017.0071.
5
Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Apr;33(2):192-197. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000829.
6
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
7
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
The Psychological Appeal of Fake-News Attributions.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):848-857. doi: 10.1177/0956797620922785. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Self Multi-Head Attention-based Convolutional Neural Networks for fake news detection.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0222713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222713. eCollection 2019.
10
Infodemic and Fake News in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;18(4):1781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041781.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Waste in covid-19 research.
BMJ. 2020 May 12;369:m1847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1847.
3
Access to Clinical Trials for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: A Meta-Research Analysis.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Aug 1;3(4):pkz057. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz057. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
5
Considerations and methods for placebo controls in surgical trials (ASPIRE guidelines).
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):828-838. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33137-X.
6
Resource allocation for biomedical research: analysis of investments by major funders.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 17;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0532-0.
7
Reporting of data monitoring committees and adverse events in paediatric trials: a descriptive analysis.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Mar 20;3(1):e000426. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000426. eCollection 2019.
9
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):e258-e262. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001922.
10
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验