Suppr超能文献

完整街道上的主动交通:可感知及经审核的步行适宜性相关因素

Active Transportation on a Complete Street: Perceived and Audited Walkability Correlates.

作者信息

Jensen Wyatt A, Brown Barbara B, Smith Ken R, Brewer Simon C, Amburgey Jonathan W, McIff Brett

机构信息

Department of Family & Consumer Studies, University of Utah, 225 S 1400 E RM 228, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Department of Family & Consumer Studies and Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 225 S 1400 E RM 228, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;14(9):1014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091014.

Abstract

Few studies of walkability include both perceived and audited walkability measures. We examined perceived walkability (Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale-Abbreviated, NEWS-A) and audited walkability (Irvine-Minnesota Inventory, IMI) measures for residents living within 2 km of a "complete street"-one renovated with light rail, bike lanes, and sidewalks. For perceived walkability, we found some differences but substantial similarity between our final scales and those in a prior published confirmatory factor analysis. Perceived walkability, in interaction with distance, was related to complete street active transportation. Residents were likely to have active transportation on the street when they lived nearby and perceived good aesthetics, crime safety, and traffic safety. Audited walkability, analyzed with decision trees, showed three general clusters of walkability areas, with 12 specific subtypes. A subset of walkability items ( = 11), including sidewalks, zebra-striped crosswalks, decorative sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and blank walls combined to cluster street segments. The 12 subtypes yielded 81% correct classification of residents' active transportation. Both perceived and audited walkability were important predictors of active transportation. For audited walkability, we recommend more exploration of decision tree approaches, given their predictive utility and ease of translation into walkability interventions.

摘要

很少有关于可步行性的研究同时纳入了主观感受和实地考察的可步行性指标。我们针对居住在距离“完整街道”(即经过轻轨、自行车道和人行道翻新的街道)2公里范围内的居民,研究了主观感受的可步行性(邻里环境可步行性量表简版,NEWS-A)和实地考察的可步行性(欧文 - 明尼苏达量表,IMI)指标。对于主观感受的可步行性,我们发现我们最终的量表与之前发表的验证性因素分析中的量表存在一些差异,但也有很大的相似性。主观感受的可步行性与距离相互作用,与完整街道的主动交通方式有关。当居民居住在附近且认为街道美观、犯罪安全和交通安全状况良好时,他们更有可能选择主动交通方式出行。通过决策树分析实地考察的可步行性,发现了三个一般的可步行性区域类别,以及12个具体的子类型。一部分可步行性项目(n = 11),包括人行道、斑马线、装饰性人行道、行人信号灯和空白墙壁,共同构成了街道段的聚类。这12个子类型对居民主动交通方式的分类准确率达到81%。主观感受和实地考察的可步行性都是主动交通方式的重要预测因素。对于实地考察的可步行性,鉴于决策树方法的预测效用以及易于转化为可步行性干预措施,我们建议进一步探索该方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fca/5615551/b0c483e98305/ijerph-14-01014-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验