São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Dental Research Center, Campinas, Brazil.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e59-e67. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12663. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
To evaluate shade stability, surface roughness, microhardness, and compressive strength of a glazed feldspathic ceramic subjected to bleaching and simulated brushing.
Eighty-eight glazed feldspathic ceramic specimens were made from microparticulate leucite and divided into eight groups (n = 10). The whitening products used were: Opalescence Trèswhite Supreme (Ultradent), Opalescence®\ PF 15% (Ultradent), and Oral-B 3D White Whitestrips. All substances for whitening were used for 4 hours/day for a period of 14 days; the control group was not bleached. Next, half of the specimens were individually brushed. Microhardness and surface roughness data were subjected to three-way ANOVA and Tukey test. The diametrical tensile strength data were subjected to two-way ANOVA. The shade change data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and the Student-Newman-Keuls test. The significance level was set at 5%.
Glazed feldspathic ceramic surface microhardness was significantly affected by bleaching agents (p = 0.007). Initially, glazed ceramic microhardness was significantly higher than that observed after contact with the bleaching agents, whether or not brushing was performed. The specimens submitted to bleaching in preloaded trays presented lower surface roughness values after brushing (p = 0.037). The surface roughness was significantly lower in the brushed specimens (p = 0.044). The diametrical tensile strength was not significantly affected by the application of bleaching agents (p = 0.563) or by brushing (p = 0.477). When the specimens were brushed, however, shade change was significantly influenced by the bleaching agent used (p = 0.041).
Bleaching agents associated with brushing cycles can alter surface properties and shade stability of glazed feldspathic ceramics, though such findings may not reflect the performance of unglazed feldspathic ceramics.
评估上釉长石陶瓷在漂白和模拟刷牙后的颜色稳定性、表面粗糙度、显微硬度和抗压强度。
从微颗粒性的白榴石中制作了 88 个上釉长石陶瓷标本,并将其分为 8 组(n = 10)。使用的增白产品有:Ultradent 的 Opalescence Trèswhite Supreme、Opalescence®\ PF 15% 和 Oral-B 3D White Whitestrips。所有增白物质每天使用 4 小时,持续 14 天;对照组不进行漂白。然后,将一半的标本单独刷牙。对显微硬度和表面粗糙度数据进行三因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验。对直径拉伸强度数据进行双因素方差分析。使用 Kruskal-Wallis、Mann-Whitney 和 Student-Newman-Keuls 检验分析颜色变化数据。显著性水平设为 5%。
上釉长石陶瓷表面显微硬度受漂白剂显著影响(p = 0.007)。最初,上釉陶瓷的显微硬度明显高于接触漂白剂后的显微硬度,无论是否刷牙。在预加载托盘上进行漂白的标本在刷牙后表面粗糙度值较低(p = 0.037)。刷牙后的标本表面粗糙度明显较低(p = 0.044)。直径拉伸强度不受漂白剂应用(p = 0.563)或刷牙(p = 0.477)的显著影响。然而,当标本刷牙时,漂白剂的使用显著影响颜色变化(p = 0.041)。
与刷牙循环结合使用的漂白剂会改变上釉长石陶瓷的表面特性和颜色稳定性,但这些发现可能无法反映未上釉长石陶瓷的性能。