Chitsaz Foujan, Ghodsi Safoura, Harehdasht Solaleh Amirpour, Goodarzi Bahar, Zeighami Somayeh
Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):628-633. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_273_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
The present study aimed to evaluate the color and translucency changes of the feldspathic porcelain samples made using the conventional or computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods after immersion in staining solutions and laser bleaching.
A total of 72 samples of feldspathic porcelain were fabricated using the conventional ( = 36) or CAD/CAM ( = 36) methods. Afterward, each group was randomly divided into three subgroups ( = 12), which underwent exposure to coffee, orange juice, or distilled water for 6 weeks. Then, the samples underwent diode laser-assisted bleaching. A spectrophotometer assessed the samples' color and translucency preintervention, after staining, and after bleaching.
One-way and two-way analysis of variance and independent -test were used. The significance level was 0.05.
Staining for 6 weeks significantly changed the color of both types of feldspathic porcelains. Furthermore, there were significant differences between the ceramics made using different methods and immersed in different staining solutions ( < 0.001). Furthermore, laser-assisted bleaching changed the color of immersed specimens significantly ( = 0.005). However, there were no significant translucency changes in all the subgroups after staining ( = 0.215) and laser bleaching ( = 0.325).
The staining-induced discoloration of all the subgroups was in the clinically acceptable range (ΔΕ<3.3). In addition, bleaching could effectively remove the stains in both types of ceramics while not affecting the primary color. Moreover, the translucency of the ceramics was not affected by staining or laser-assisted bleaching.
本研究旨在评估采用传统方法或计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)方法制作的长石质瓷样本在浸入染色溶液和激光漂白后的颜色和透明度变化。
使用传统方法(n = 36)或CAD/CAM方法(n = 36)制作了总共72个长石质瓷样本。之后,每组随机分为三个亚组(n = 12),分别暴露于咖啡、橙汁或蒸馏水中6周。然后,对样本进行二极管激光辅助漂白。用分光光度计在干预前、染色后和漂白后评估样本的颜色和透明度。
采用单向和双向方差分析以及独立t检验。显著性水平为0.05。
染色6周显著改变了两种类型长石质瓷的颜色。此外,使用不同方法制作并浸入不同染色溶液的陶瓷之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。此外,激光辅助漂白显著改变了浸入样本的颜色(P = 0.005)。然而,在所有亚组中,染色后(P = 0.215)和激光漂白后(P = 0.325)透明度均无显著变化。
所有亚组染色引起的变色均在临床可接受范围内(ΔΕ<3.3)。此外,漂白可有效去除两种类型陶瓷中的污渍,同时不影响原色。而且,陶瓷的透明度不受染色或激光辅助漂白的影响。