Amirpour Harehdasht Solaleh, Zeighami Somayeh, Chitsaz Foujan, Ghodsi Safoura
Department of Prosthodontics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 May 4;13:e20. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.20. eCollection 2022.
The prevalence of using different esthetic methods increases the possibility of close contact between them with potential adverse interactions. This study aimed to compare the surface changes (microhardness and roughness) in two types of feldspathic porcelain after laser bleaching and post-bleach polishing. 12 standardized rectangular specimens were prepared for each porcelain group (conventionally layered and CAD-CAM milled). Vickers microhardness and roughness were evaluated before and after the bleaching procedure and after polishing. Data were statistically analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and test ( < 0.05). The surface roughness of both groups increased significantly after laser bleaching ( < 0.001 for conventional and =0.004 for CAD-CAM porcelains). The polishing process reduced the roughness of both groups; the reduction was significant in conventional specimens (=0.020). The surface hardness values did not change significantly in the groups after bleaching and post-bleach polishing stages (=0.142). Generally, the average surface roughness of CAD-CAM specimens was significantly lower ( < 0.001), and the surface microhardness of the CAD-CAM group was significantly higher than conventional porcelains (=0.011). Laser bleaching significantly increased the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelains; however, it did not affect the surface microhardness significantly. Unlike CAD-CAM specimens, polishing significantly improved the surface smoothness of conventional porcelains.
使用不同美学方法的普遍性增加了它们之间密切接触并产生潜在不良相互作用的可能性。本研究旨在比较两种类型的长石质瓷在激光漂白及漂白后抛光后的表面变化(显微硬度和粗糙度)。为每个瓷组(传统分层瓷和CAD-CAM铣削瓷)制备12个标准化的矩形试样。在漂白过程前后以及抛光后评估维氏显微硬度和粗糙度。使用重复测量方差分析和检验对数据进行统计学分析(P<0.05)。激光漂白后,两组的表面粗糙度均显著增加(传统瓷P<0.001,CAD-CAM瓷P=0.004)。抛光过程降低了两组的粗糙度;传统试样的降低幅度显著(P=0.020)。在漂白及漂白后抛光阶段后,两组的表面硬度值无显著变化(P=0.142)。总体而言,CAD-CAM试样的平均表面粗糙度显著更低(P<0.001),且CAD-CAM组的表面显微硬度显著高于传统瓷(P=0.011)。激光漂白显著增加了长石质瓷的表面粗糙度;然而,它对表面显微硬度没有显著影响。与CAD-CAM试样不同,抛光显著改善了传统瓷的表面光滑度。