Suppr超能文献

在强化治疗期间持续输注凝血因子浓缩物。

Continuous infusion of coagulation factor concentrates during intensive treatment.

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2018 Jan;24(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/hae.13331. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Abstract

In clinical management of bleeds and surgical procedures in patients suffering from bleeding disorders either repetitive bolus injections (BI) or continuous infusion (CI) can be used for coagulation factor replacement. Continuous infusion seems to be an attractive route of administration and may be considered if replacement therapy is required for more than 3 days. The strongest argument favouring continuous infusion is its superiority in providing the patient with a safe and constant level of the deficient coagulation factor by balancing input with clearance. Furthermore, several studies have shown that coagulation factor consumption may be reduced by CI compared to repetitive bolus injections (BI) since unnecessary peaks of factor level are avoided. Concerns have been raised whether continuous infusion of coagulation concentrates is associated with an increased risk of developing inhibitors. However, available data have so far not shown an increased risk for inhibitor development in severe haemophilia patients with more than 50 exposure days of coagulation factor concentrates. Further, previously reported complications when using CI such as phlebitis at the infusion site and pump failure are nowadays very seldom seen when small amounts of heparin are added to the infusion bag, and increased quality of the pumps are available. Over the last decades, numerous reports have confirmed CI to be a safe and effective mode of coagulation factor replacement even in the most challenging surgical procedures, such as total joint arthroplasties.

摘要

在患有出血性疾病的患者的出血管理和手术中,可重复推注(BI)或连续输注(CI)用于凝血因子替代。连续输注似乎是一种有吸引力的给药途径,如果需要超过 3 天的替代治疗,可以考虑连续输注。支持连续输注的最强论点是,它通过平衡输入和清除,为患者提供安全且稳定的缺乏的凝血因子水平,从而具有优越性。此外,多项研究表明,与重复推注(BI)相比,CI 可减少凝血因子的消耗,因为避免了不必要的因子水平峰值。人们担心连续输注凝血浓缩物是否会增加产生抑制剂的风险。然而,迄今为止,可用数据并未显示在接受超过 50 天凝血因子浓缩物暴露的严重血友病患者中,连续输注与抑制剂发展风险增加相关。此外,当在输注袋中添加少量肝素并提供更高质量的输注泵时,现在很少见到以前报道的 CI 相关并发症,如输注部位静脉炎和泵故障。在过去几十年中,大量报告证实 CI 是一种安全有效的凝血因子替代方式,即使在最具挑战性的手术中也是如此,例如全关节置换术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验