• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估荷兰心脏病学初级保健加干预对三重目标结果的影响:基于实践的定量和定性研究的设计。

Evaluating a Dutch cardiology primary care plus intervention on the Triple Aim outcomes: study design of a practice-based quantitative and qualitative research.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Research Centre for Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2580-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2580-x
PMID:28874148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5585935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to deal with the pressures on the health-care system and to guarantee sustainability, changes are needed. This study focuses on a cardiology primary care plus intervention. Primary care plus (PC+) is a new health-care delivery model focused on substitution of specialist care in the hospital setting with specialist care in the primary care setting. The intervention consists of a cardiology PC+ centre in which cardiologists, supported by other health-care professionals, provide consultations in a primary care setting. The PC+ centre aims to improve the health of the population and quality of care as experienced by patients, and reduce the number of referrals to hospital-based outpatient specialist care in order to reduce health-care costs. These aims reflect the Triple Aim principle. Hence, the objectives of the study are to evaluate the cardiology PC+ centre in terms of the Triple Aim outcomes and to evaluate the process of the introduction of PC+.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a practice-based, quantitative study with a longitudinal observational design, and an additional qualitative study to supplement, interpret and improve the quantitative study. The study population of the quantitative part will consist of adult patients (≥18 years) with non-acute and low-complexity cardiology-related health complaints, who will be referred to the cardiology PC+ centre (intervention group) or hospital-based outpatient cardiology care (control group). All eligible patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at three different time points consisting of questions about their demographics, health status and experience of care. Additionally, quantitative data will be collected about health-care utilization and related health-care costs at the PC+ centre and the hospital. The qualitative part, consisting of semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and observations, is designed to evaluate the process as well as to amplify, clarify and explain quantitative results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will evaluate a cardiology PC+ centre using quantitative and supplementary qualitative methods. The findings of both sub-studies will fill a gap in knowledge about the effects of PC+ and in particular whether PC+ is able to pursue the Triple Aim outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NTR6629 (Data registered: 25-08-2017) (registered retrospectively).

摘要

背景

为了应对医疗体系的压力并确保可持续性,需要进行变革。本研究聚焦于心脏病学初级保健加干预。初级保健加(PC+)是一种新的医疗保健提供模式,专注于将医院环境中的专科护理替代为初级保健环境中的专科护理。该干预措施包括一个心脏病学 PC+中心,其中心脏病专家在其他医疗保健专业人员的支持下,在初级保健环境中提供咨询服务。PC+中心旨在改善人群的健康状况和患者体验到的护理质量,并减少向基于医院的门诊专科护理的转诊数量,以降低医疗保健成本。这些目标反映了三重目标原则。因此,本研究的目的是评估心脏病学 PC+中心在三重目标结果方面的情况,并评估 PC+引入的过程。

方法/设计:本研究是一项基于实践的、定量的、纵向观察性研究,并进行了一项额外的定性研究,以补充、解释和改进定量研究。定量部分的研究人群将包括患有非急性和低复杂性心脏病相关健康问题的成年患者(≥18 岁),他们将被转介到心脏病学 PC+中心(干预组)或基于医院的门诊心脏病护理(对照组)。所有符合条件的患者将被要求在三个不同时间点完成调查问卷,内容包括他们的人口统计学、健康状况和护理体验相关问题。此外,还将收集有关 PC+中心和医院的卫生保健利用情况和相关卫生保健费用的定量数据。定性部分由半结构式访谈、焦点小组和观察组成,旨在评估过程,并放大、澄清和解释定量结果。

结论

本研究将使用定量和补充定性方法评估心脏病学 PC+中心。这两个子研究的结果将填补关于 PC+效果的知识空白,特别是 PC+是否能够追求三重目标结果。

试验注册

NTR6629(数据注册:2017 年 8 月 25 日)(回顾性注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6b3/5585935/75e164a1a10b/12913_2017_2580_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6b3/5585935/75e164a1a10b/12913_2017_2580_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6b3/5585935/75e164a1a10b/12913_2017_2580_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating a Dutch cardiology primary care plus intervention on the Triple Aim outcomes: study design of a practice-based quantitative and qualitative research.评估荷兰心脏病学初级保健加干预对三重目标结果的影响:基于实践的定量和定性研究的设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2580-x.
2
Substituting hospital-based outpatient cardiology care: The impact on quality, health and costs.替代医院为基础的门诊心脏病学护理:对质量、健康和成本的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217923. eCollection 2019.
3
Shifting hospital care to primary care: An evaluation of cardiology care in a primary care setting in the Netherlands.将医院护理转移至初级护理:荷兰初级护理环境下的心脏病护理评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 9;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0734-5.
4
Substitution of outpatient care with primary care: a feasibility study on the experiences among general practitioners, medical specialists and patients.用初级保健替代门诊护理:关于全科医生、医学专家和患者体验的可行性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 9;17:108. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0498-8.
5
Substitution of hospital care with Primary Care Plus: differences in referral patterns according to specialty, specialist and diagnosis group.以初级保健加取代医院护理:按专业、专科医生和诊断组划分的转诊模式差异。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 11;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0961-4.
6
Reorganising dermatology care: predictors of the substitution of secondary care with primary care.重新组织皮肤科护理:替代二级护理为初级护理的预测因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05368-2.
7
A randomised controlled trial of joint consultations with general practitioners and cardiologists in primary care.在初级医疗保健中,全科医生与心脏病专家联合会诊的随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Feb;53(487):108-12.
8
Primary palliative Care in General Practice - study protocol of a three-stage mixed-methods organizational health services research study.初级缓和医疗在全科医学中的应用——一项三阶段混合方法组织卫生服务研究的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 30;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0276-6.
9
Substitution of outpatient hospital care with specialist care in the primary care setting: A systematic review on quality of care, health and costs.在初级保健环境中用专科护理替代门诊医院护理:关于护理质量、健康和成本的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0219957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219957. eCollection 2019.
10
Implementation of a new prenatal care model to reduce office visits and increase connectivity and continuity of care: protocol for a mixed-methods study.实施一种新的产前护理模式以减少门诊就诊次数并增强护理的连通性和连续性:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 2;15:323. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0762-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' perspectives on a new delivery model in primary care: A propensity score matched analysis of patient-reported outcomes in a Dutch cohort study.患者对初级医疗保健新服务模式的看法:一项荷兰队列研究中患者报告结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;27(2):344-355. doi: 10.1111/jep.13426. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Substituting hospital-based outpatient cardiology care: The impact on quality, health and costs.替代医院为基础的门诊心脏病学护理:对质量、健康和成本的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217923. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
What do we mean when we talk about the Triple Aim? A systematic review of evolving definitions and adaptations of the framework at the health system level.当我们谈论“三重目标”时,我们指的是什么?对卫生系统层面该框架不断演变的定义和适应性调整的系统评价。
Health Policy. 2017 Jun;121(6):629-636. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
2
Perennial Health Care Reform--The Long Dutch Quest for Cost Control and Quality Improvement.长期医疗保健改革——荷兰对成本控制和质量提升的漫长探索。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 3;373(10):885-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1410422.
3
Variations in health care delivery within the European Union.
欧盟内部医疗服务的差异。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:1-2. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku223.
4
Financial impact of the GFC: health care spending across the OECD.全球金融危机的财务影响:经合组织国家的医疗保健支出
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Jan;10(1):7-19. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000218.
5
How to evaluate population management? Transforming the Care Continuum Alliance population health guide toward a broadly applicable analytical framework.如何评估人群管理?将照护连续体联盟的人群健康指南转变为一个广泛适用的分析框架。
Health Policy. 2015 Apr;119(4):522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
6
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study.EQ-5D-5L 与 EQ-5D-3L 在八个患者群体中的测量性能比较:一项多国家研究。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1717-27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
7
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.共同决策:一种临床实践模式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed.加快将医疗保健研究转化为实践的建议:需要进行重大变革。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023.
9
Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands.通过捆绑支付整合医疗服务——来自荷兰的经验教训。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.
10
The Netherlands: health system review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228.