Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死中高剂量静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林和静脉注射肝素的随机析因试验。ISIS(心肌梗死存活国际研究)初步研究。

Randomized factorial trial of high-dose intravenous streptokinase, of oral aspirin and of intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction. ISIS (International Studies of Infarct Survival) pilot study.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1987 Jun;8(6):634-42.

PMID:2887430
Abstract

619 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI) were randomized to receive either a high-dose short-term intravenous infusion of streptokinase (1.5 MU over one hour) or placebo. Using a '2 X 2 X 2 factorial' design, patients were also randomized to receive either oral aspirin (325 mg on alternate days for 28 days) or placebo, and separately randomized to receive either intravenous heparin (1000 IU h-1 for 48 hours) or no heparin. Streptokinase (SK) was associated with a nonsignificant (NS) increase in non-fatal reinfarction (3.9% SK vs 2.9% placebo) and decrease in mortality (7.5% vs 9.7% in hospital plus 6.1% vs 8.7% after discharge). After SK, there were significantly fewer strokes (0.5% vs 2.4%; 2P less than 0.05), but significantly more minor adverse events (e.g. hypotension and bradycardia, allergies, bruises or minor bleeds, nausea). Aspirin was associated with fewer non-fatal reinfarctions (3.2% aspirin vs 3.9% placebo; NS), deaths (in hospital: 6.1% vs 10.5%; 2P less than 0.05, and after discharge: 7.0% vs 6.9%; NS), and strokes (0.3% vs 2.0%; NS). Heparin was associated with a decrease in reinfarction (2.2% heparin vs 4.9% no heparin; NS), though not in mortality (in hospital: 8.0% vs 8.5%; NS, and after discharge: 7.0% vs 6.9%; NS), and with a trend towards more strokes (1.6% vs 0.7%; NS) and more bruising and bleeding (14% vs 12%; NS). To assess more reliably the effects of aspirin and of this SK regimen on mortality, about 400 hospitals worldwide are now collaborating in a large (about 20,000 patients planned) randomized trial (ISIS-2), for which the present study was a pilot.

摘要

619例疑似急性心肌梗死(MI)患者被随机分为两组,分别接受大剂量短期静脉注射链激酶(1小时内注射150万单位)或安慰剂治疗。采用“2×2×2析因设计”,患者还被随机分为两组,分别接受口服阿司匹林(每隔一天服用325毫克,共28天)或安慰剂,另外又被随机分为两组,分别接受静脉注射肝素(每小时1000国际单位,共48小时)或不接受肝素治疗。链激酶(SK)与非致命性再梗死的增加无显著差异(SK组为3.9%,安慰剂组为2.9%),但死亡率有所降低(住院期间:7.5%对9.7%,出院后:6.1%对8.7%)。使用链激酶后,中风明显减少(0.5%对2.4%;P<0.05),但轻微不良事件明显增多(如低血压、心动过缓、过敏、瘀伤或轻微出血、恶心)。阿司匹林与较少的非致命性再梗死(阿司匹林组为3.2%,安慰剂组为3.9%;无显著差异)、死亡(住院期间:6.1%对10.5%;P<0.05,出院后:7.0%对6.9%;无显著差异)及中风(0.3%对2.0%;无显著差异)相关。肝素与再梗死的减少相关(肝素组为2.2%,未用肝素组为4.9%;无显著差异),但与死亡率无关(住院期间:8.0%对8.5%;无显著差异,出院后:7.0%对6.9%;无显著差异),且有中风增多(1.6%对0.7%;无显著差异)及瘀伤和出血增多(14%对12%;无显著差异)的趋势。为更可靠地评估阿司匹林和这种链激酶治疗方案对死亡率的影响,目前全球约400家医院正在合作开展一项大型随机试验(ISIS - 2,计划纳入约20000例患者),本研究为此试验的预试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验