• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者联用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死生存国际研究)协作组

Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Dec;12(6 Suppl A):3A-13A. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92635-6.

DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(88)92635-6
PMID:2903874
Abstract

17,187 patients entering 417 hospitals up to 24 h (median 5 h) after the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction were randomized, with placebo control, between i) a 1 h intravenous infusion of 1.5 million units of streptokinase; ii) 1 month of 160 mg/day enteric-coated aspirin; iii) both active treatments; or iv) neither. Streptokinase alone and aspirin alone each produced a highly significant reduction in 5 week vascular mortality: 791/8592 (9.2%) vascular deaths among patients allocated streptokinase infusion versus 1029/8595 (12.0%) among those allocated placebo infusion (odds reduction: 25% +/- 4; 2p less than 0.00001); 804/8587 (9.4%) vascular deaths among patients allocated aspirin tablets versus 1016/8600 (11.8%) among those allocated placebo tablets (odds reduction: 23% +/- 4; 2p less than 0.00001). The combination of streptokinase and aspirin was significantly (2p less than 0.0001) better than either agent alone. Their separate effects on vascular death appeared to be additive: 343/4292 (8.0%) among patients allocated both active agents versus 568/4300 (13.2%) among those allocated neither (odds reduction: 42% +/- 5; 95% confidence limits 34% to 50%). There was evidence of benefit rom each agent even for patients treated late after pain onset (odds reduction at 0-4, 5-12, and 13-24 h: 35% +/- 6, 16% +/- 7 and 21% +/- 12 for streptokinase alone; 25% +/- 7,21% +/- 7 and 21% +/- 12 for aspirin alone; and 53% +/- 8,32% +/- 9 and 38% +/- 15 for the combination of streptokinase and aspirin). Streptokinase was associated with an excess of bleeds requiring transfusion (0.5% versus 0.2%) and of confirmed cerebral hemorrhage (0.1% versus 0.0%), but with fewer other strokes (0.6% versus 0.8%). These "other" strokes may have included a few undiagnosed cerebral hemorrhages, but still there was no increase in total strokes (0.7% streptokinase versus 0.8% placebo infusion). Aspirin significantly reduced nonfatal reinfarction (1.0% versus 2.0%) and nonfatal stroke (0.3% versus 0.6%), and was not associated with any significant increase in cerebral hemorrhage or in bleeds requiring transfusion. An excess of nonfatal reinfarction was reported when streptokinase was used alone, but this appeared to be entirely avoided by the addition of aspirin. Those allocated the combination of streptokinase and aspirin had significantly fewer reinfarctions (1.8% versus 2.9%), strokes (0.6% versus 1.1%), and deaths (8.0% versus 13.2%) than those allocated neither.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

417家医院共纳入了17187例疑似急性心肌梗死发作后24小时内(中位数为5小时)入院的患者,进行随机分组并设置安慰剂对照,分组情况如下:i)静脉输注150万单位链激酶1小时;ii)服用160毫克/天的肠溶阿司匹林1个月;iii)同时接受两种活性治疗;或iv)两种治疗均不接受。单独使用链激酶和单独使用阿司匹林均使5周血管死亡率显著降低:接受链激酶输注的患者中有791/8592(9.2%)发生血管死亡,而接受安慰剂输注的患者中有1029/8595(12.0%)发生血管死亡(比值降低:25%±4;P<0.00001);接受阿司匹林片治疗的患者中有804/8587(9.4%)发生血管死亡,而接受安慰剂片治疗的患者中有1016/8600(11.8%)发生血管死亡(比值降低:23%±4;P<0.00001)。链激酶和阿司匹林联合使用的效果显著优于单独使用任何一种药物(P<0.0001)。它们对血管死亡的单独作用似乎具有相加性:接受两种活性药物治疗的患者中有343/4292(8.0%)发生血管死亡,而未接受任何治疗的患者中有568/4300(13.2%)发生血管死亡(比值降低:42%±5;95%置信区间为34%至50%)。即使对于疼痛发作后较晚接受治疗的患者,每种药物也都显示出有益效果(链激酶单独使用时,在0 - 4小时、5 - 12小时和13 - 24小时的比值降低分别为:35%±6、16%±7和21%±12;阿司匹林单独使用时分别为:25%±7、21%±7和21%±12;链激酶和阿司匹林联合使用时分别为:53%±8、32%±9和38%±15)。链激酶与需要输血的出血事件(0.5%对0.2%)及确诊的脑出血()0.1%对0.0%)增多相关,但其他中风事件较少(0.6%对0.8%)。这些“其他”中风可能包括一些未被诊断出的脑出血,但总体中风发生率并未增加(链激酶组为0.7%,安慰剂输注组为0.8%)。阿司匹林显著降低了非致命性再梗死(1.0%对2.0%)和非致命性中风(0.3%对0.6%),且与脑出血或需要输血的出血事件显著增加无关。单独使用链激酶时报告有非致命性再梗死增多的情况,但添加阿司匹林后似乎完全避免了这种情况。接受链激酶和阿司匹林联合治疗的患者发生再梗死(1.8%对2.9%)、中风(0.6%对1.1%)和死亡()8.0%对13.2%)的情况显著少于未接受任何治疗的患者。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者联用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死生存国际研究)协作组
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Dec;12(6 Suppl A):3A-13A. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92635-6.
2
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者并用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死存活国际研究)协作组
Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349-60.
3
ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-3研究:在41299例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中,对链激酶、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂、茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物进行随机比较,并对阿司匹林加肝素与单用阿司匹林进行比较。ISIS-3(第三次国际心肌梗死生存研究)协作组
Lancet. 1992 Mar 28;339(8796):753-70.
4
Randomized factorial trial of high-dose intravenous streptokinase, of oral aspirin and of intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction. ISIS (International Studies of Infarct Survival) pilot study.急性心肌梗死中高剂量静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林和静脉注射肝素的随机析因试验。ISIS(心肌梗死存活国际研究)初步研究。
Eur Heart J. 1987 Jun;8(6):634-42.
5
ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-2研究:疑似急性心肌梗死患者在静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者联合或两者均不用的随机对照试验中的10年生存率。ISIS-2(第二项心肌梗死生存国际研究)协作组
BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1337-43. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1337.
6
ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-4:一项随机析因试验,在58050例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中评估早期口服卡托普利、口服单硝酸酯和静脉注射硫酸镁。ISIS-4(第四次国际心肌梗死存活研究)协作组
Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):669-85.
7
Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group.
Lancet. 1986 Jul 12;2(8498):57-66.
8
Streptokinase. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in acute myocardial infarction in older patients.链激酶。老年患者急性心肌梗死中其药理学及治疗效果的综述
Drugs Aging. 1994 Jan;4(1):63-86. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199404010-00007.
9
Intravenous streptokinase. A reappraisal of its therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction.静脉注射链激酶。对其在急性心肌梗死治疗中的应用重新评估。
Drugs. 1990 May;39(5):693-719. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039050-00006.
10
Clinical effects of anticoagulant therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview of randomised trials.抗凝治疗对疑似急性心肌梗死的临床疗效:随机试验的系统综述
BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):652-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.652.

引用本文的文献

1
Treating Cardiovascular Disorders with Personalized Medicine.用个性化医疗治疗心血管疾病。
Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2025;25(2):98-118. doi: 10.2174/011871529X361429250215190129.
2
Risk of angioedema and thrombolytic therapy among stroke patients: An analysis of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.中风患者血管性水肿风险与溶栓治疗:来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的数据分析
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jan;22(1):e00474. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00474. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
3
Correlation between hospital rates of survival to discharge and long-term survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest: Insights from Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry.
住院心脏骤停患者出院生存率与长期生存率之间的相关性:来自“遵循指南®-复苏”注册研究的见解
Resuscitation. 2024 Sep;202:110322. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110322. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
The Efficacy and Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review.抗血小板治疗在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效与安全性:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 29;15(11):e49631. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49631. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Versus Streptokinase in the Management of Myocardial Infarction in Developing Countries.替奈普酶与链激酶在发展中国家心肌梗死治疗中疗效与安全性的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Aug 25;15(8):e44125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44125. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
The credibility of subgroup analyses reported in stroke trials is low: A systematic review.亚组分析在卒中试验中的可信度较低:一项系统评价。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Dec;18(10):1161-1168. doi: 10.1177/17474930231168517. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
From Q/Non-Q Myocardial Infarction to STEMI/NSTEMI: Why It's Time to Consider Another Simplified Dichotomy; a Narrative Literature Review.从非ST段抬高型心肌梗死到ST段抬高型心肌梗死/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死:为何是时候考虑另一种简化二分法了;一篇叙述性文献综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 1;10(1). doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1783. eCollection 2022.
8
Influenza Vaccination for Cardiovascular Prevention: Further Insights from the IAMI Trial and an Updated Meta-analysis.心血管预防中的流感疫苗接种:IAMl 试验的进一步见解和更新的荟萃分析。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01748-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
9
Cohort cholecystectomies in the Brazilian public system: is access to laparoscopy universal after three decades?巴西公共系统中的队列胆囊切除术:三十年之后腹腔镜手术的应用是否普及?
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Jul 15;49:e20223180. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223180-en. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of Treatment with Colchicine after Acute Coronary Syndrome on Major Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.秋水仙碱治疗急性冠状动脉综合征后对主要心血管事件的影响:临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Apr 13;2022:8317011. doi: 10.1155/2022/8317011. eCollection 2022.