Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Seoul National University College of Medicine and Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01502-17. Print 2017 Nov.
More-permissive preclinical models may be useful in evaluating antituberculosis regimens for their propensity to select drug-resistant mutants. To evaluate whether acquired rifamycin monoresistance could be recapitulated in mice and, if so, to evaluate the effects of immunodeficiency, intermittent dosing, and drug exposures, athymic nude and BALB/c mice were infected. Controls received daily rifapentine alone or 2 months of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by 4 months of rifampin/isoniazid, either daily or twice weekly with one of two isoniazid doses. Test groups received the same intensive regimen followed by once-weekly rifapentine or isoniazid/rifapentine with rifapentine doses of 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg of body weight plus one of two isoniazid doses. All combination regimens rendered BALB/c mouse cultures negative but selected mutants resistant to isoniazid (8.5%, 12/140) or rifampin (3.5%, 5/140) in nude mice ( < 0.001). Intermittently dosed intensive-phase therapy selected isoniazid and rifampin resistance in 10% (8/80, < 0.001) and 20% (16/80, = 0.009) of nude mice, respectively, compared to 0% treated with a daily regimen. Once-weekly rifapentine-containing continuation-phase regimens selected rifampin-resistant mutants at a rate of 18.0% (18/100, = 0.035 compared to rifampin/isoniazid regimens). Higher isoniazid doses in the intermittent-treatment control regimen and higher rifapentine doses in once-weekly regimens were associated with less selection of isoniazid resistance. Acquired resistance, including rifamycin monoresistance, was more likely to occur in nude mice despite administration of combination therapy. These results recapitulate clinical outcomes and indicate that nude mice may be useful for evaluating the ability of novel regimens to prevent the selection of resistance.
更宽松的临床前模型可能有助于评估抗结核方案选择耐药突变体的倾向。为了评估获得性利福霉素单耐药是否可以在小鼠中重现,如果可以,评估免疫缺陷、间歇性给药和药物暴露的影响,我们感染了无胸腺裸鼠和 BALB/c 小鼠。对照组每日接受利福喷丁单药治疗或接受 2 个月利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇治疗,然后接受 4 个月利福平/异烟肼治疗,每日或每周 2 次,异烟肼剂量为两种之一。实验组接受相同的强化方案,然后每周一次利福喷丁或异烟肼/利福喷丁,利福喷丁剂量为 10、15 或 20mg/kg 体重,异烟肼剂量为两种之一。所有联合方案均使 BALB/c 小鼠培养物转为阴性,但在裸鼠中选择对异烟肼(8.5%,12/140)或利福平(3.5%,5/140)耐药的突变体(<0.001)。间歇性强化期治疗在 10%(8/80,<0.001)和 20%(16/80,=0.009)的裸鼠中选择异烟肼和利福平耐药,与每日方案治疗的 0%相比(<0.001)。每周一次的含利福喷丁的维持期方案以 18.0%(18/100,=0.035 与利福平/异烟肼方案相比)的速率选择利福平耐药突变体。间歇性治疗对照组中较高的异烟肼剂量和每周一次方案中较高的利福喷丁剂量与异烟肼耐药的选择减少相关。尽管给予联合治疗,但在裸鼠中更可能发生获得性耐药,包括利福霉素单耐药。这些结果重现了临床结果,并表明裸鼠可能有助于评估新方案预防耐药选择的能力。