Faine Brett A, Mohr Nicholas, Dietrich Jenna, Meadow Laura, Harland Kari K, Chrischilles Elizabeth
University of Iowa, College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa.
University of Iowa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):856-863. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.33901. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Pneumonia impacts over four million people annually and is the leading cause of infectious disease-related hospitalization and mortality in the United States. Appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy decreases hospital length of stay and improves mortality. The objective of our study was to test the hypothesis that the presence of an emergency medicine (EM) clinical pharmacist improves the timing and appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP).
This was a retrospective observational cohort study of all emergency department (ED) patients presenting to a Midwest 60,000-visit academic ED from July 1, 2008, to March 1, 2016, who presented to the ED with pneumonia and received antimicrobial therapy. The treatment group consisted of patients who presented during the hours an EM pharmacist was present in the ED (Monday-Friday, 0900-1800). The control group included patients presenting during the hours when an EM clinical pharmacist was not physically present in the ED (Monday-Friday, 1800-0900, Saturday/Sunday 0000-2400 day). We defined appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy using the Infectious Diseases Society of America consensus guidelines on the management of CAP, and management of HCAP.
A total of 406 patients were included in the final analysis (103 treatment patients and 303 control patients). During the hours the EM pharmacist was present, patients were significantly more likely to receive appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy (58.3% vs. 38.3%; p<0.001). Regardless of pneumonia type, patients seen while an EM pharmacist was present were significantly more likely to receive appropriate antimicrobial therapy (CAP, 77.7% vs. 52.9% p=0.008, HCAP, 47.7% vs. 28.8%, p=0.005). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes.
The presence of an EM clinical pharmacist significantly increases the likelihood of appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for patients presenting to the ED with pneumonia.
肺炎每年影响超过400万人,是美国传染病相关住院和死亡的主要原因。恰当的经验性抗菌治疗可缩短住院时间并改善死亡率。我们研究的目的是检验以下假设:急诊医学(EM)临床药师的存在可改善社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和医疗保健相关肺炎(HCAP)经验性抗菌治疗的及时性和恰当性。
这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象为2008年7月1日至2016年3月1日期间前往中西部一家年就诊量达60000人次的学术性急诊科、因肺炎就诊并接受抗菌治疗的所有急诊科(ED)患者。治疗组由在急诊室有急诊药师值班时间(周一至周五,09:00 - 18:00)就诊的患者组成。对照组包括在急诊室没有急诊临床药师实际值班时间(周一至周五,18:00 - 09:00,周六/周日00:00 - 24:00)就诊的患者。我们根据美国传染病学会关于CAP管理和HCAP管理的共识指南来定义恰当的经验性抗菌治疗。
最终分析纳入了406例患者(103例治疗组患者和303例对照组患者)。在急诊药师值班时间内,患者接受恰当经验性抗菌治疗的可能性显著更高(58.3%对38.3%;p<0.001)。无论肺炎类型如何,在有急诊药师值班时就诊的患者接受恰当抗菌治疗的可能性显著更高(CAP,77.7%对52.9%,p = 0.008;HCAP,47.7%对28.8%,p = 0.005)。临床结局无显著差异。
急诊临床药师的存在显著增加了因肺炎前往急诊科就诊患者接受恰当经验性抗菌治疗的可能性。