Grønseth Rune, Drengenes Christine, Wiker Harald G, Tangedal Solveig, Xue Yaxin, Husebø Gunnar Reksten, Svanes Øistein, Lehmann Sverre, Aardal Marit, Hoang Tuyen, Kalananthan Tharmini, Hjellestad Martinsen Einar Marius, Orvedal Leiten Elise, Aanerud Marianne, Nordeide Eli, Haaland Ingvild, Jonassen Inge, Bakke Per, Eagan Tomas
Dept of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Dept of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
ERJ Open Res. 2017 Aug 30;3(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00019-2017. eCollection 2017 Jul.
The aim was to evaluate susceptibility of oropharyngeal contamination with various bronchoscopic sampling techniques. 67 patients with obstructive lung disease and 58 control subjects underwent bronchoscopy with small-volume lavage (SVL) through the working channel, protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) and bilateral protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling. Subjects also provided an oral wash (OW) sample, and negative control samples were gathered for each bronchoscopy procedure. DNA encoding bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced and bioinformatically processed to cluster into operational taxonomic units (OTU), assign taxonomy and obtain measures of diversity. The proportion of Proteobacteria increased, whereas Firmicutes diminished in the order OW, SVL, PBAL, PSB (p<0.01). The alpha-diversity decreased in the same order (p<0.01). Also, beta-diversity varied by sampling method (p<0.01), and visualisation of principal coordinates analyses indicated that differences in diversity were smaller between OW and SVL and OW and PBAL samples than for OW and the PSB samples. The order of sampling (left right first) did not influence alpha- or beta-diversity for PSB samples. Studies of the airway microbiota need to address the potential for oropharyngeal contamination, and protected sampling might represent an acceptable measure to minimise this problem.
目的是评估各种支气管镜采样技术对口咽污染的易感性。67例阻塞性肺疾病患者和58例对照受试者接受了支气管镜检查,通过工作通道进行小容量灌洗(SVL)、保护性支气管肺泡灌洗(PBAL)和双侧保护性标本刷(PSB)采样。受试者还提供了口腔冲洗(OW)样本,并为每个支气管镜检查程序收集了阴性对照样本。对编码细菌16S核糖体RNA的DNA进行测序,并进行生物信息学处理,以聚类为可操作分类单元(OTU),确定分类并获得多样性指标。变形菌门的比例增加,而厚壁菌门在OW、SVL、PBAL、PSB顺序中减少(p<0.01)。α多样性以相同顺序降低(p<0.01)。此外,β多样性因采样方法而异(p<0.01),主坐标分析的可视化表明,OW与SVL以及OW与PBAL样本之间的多样性差异小于OW与PSB样本之间的差异。采样顺序(先左后右)对PSB样本的α或β多样性没有影响。气道微生物群的研究需要解决口咽污染的可能性,保护性采样可能是将这一问题降至最低的可接受措施。