• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激器取出术:手术植入片状系统移除的动机

Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems.

作者信息

Dupré Derrick A, Tomycz Nestor, Whiting Donald, Oh Michael

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):500-504. doi: 10.1111/papr.12639. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12639
PMID:28875558
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite requiring successful trials prior to implantation, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems for pain are often later removed. Removing surgically implanted hardware subjects patients to the risks and discomfort of a second surgery, threatens the cost-effectiveness of SCS, and limits the perceived durability of SCS technology for pain problems.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patterns of reasons given among patients who underwent SCS explant surgery (SCSES).

METHODS

Retrospective review of SCSES cases over 17 years at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

RESULTS

165 patients underwent SCSES between 1997 and 2014. The top 3 reasons for explantation were inadequate pain control (IPC; 73%), hardware discomfort (22%), and need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (10%). Other less frequent reasons were infection (9%), painful dysesthesias (9%), electrical arcing (4%), resolution of inciting symptoms (4%), weakness (2%), pseudomeningocele (1%) and muscle spasms (1%).

CONCLUSION

Inadequate pain control is the most common reason for SCSES. Advances in technology are needed to improve the quality and duration of pain control, as well as to design improvements to make the hardware more comfortable. A significant number of implants are removed due to need for MRI, a fact obviating the need for MRI-compatible systems. Patients considering SCS paddle lead placement should be counseled on the most common reasons for later explantation.

摘要

背景

尽管脊髓刺激(SCS)疼痛治疗系统在植入前需要成功的试验,但这些系统后期常常被移除。移除手术植入的硬件会使患者面临二次手术的风险和不适,威胁到SCS的成本效益,并限制了SCS技术在疼痛问题上的耐用性。

目的

调查接受SCS取出手术(SCSES)的患者给出的原因模式。

方法

回顾性分析宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡阿勒格尼综合医院17年间的SCSES病例。

结果

1997年至2014年间有165例患者接受了SCSES。取出的前三大原因是疼痛控制不足(IPC;73%)、硬件不适(22%)和需要进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查(10%)。其他不太常见的原因包括感染(9%)、疼痛性感觉异常(9%)、电弧(4%)、激发症状缓解(4%)、虚弱(2%)、假性脑脊膜膨出(1%)和肌肉痉挛(1%)。

结论

疼痛控制不足是SCSES最常见的原因。需要技术进步来提高疼痛控制的质量和持续时间,以及设计改进以使硬件更舒适。相当数量的植入物因需要进行MRI检查而被取出,这一事实消除了对MRI兼容系统的需求。对于考虑植入SCS片状电极的患者,应就后期取出的最常见原因进行咨询。

相似文献

1
Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems.脊髓刺激器取出术:手术植入片状系统移除的动机
Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):500-504. doi: 10.1111/papr.12639. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Explantation of Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Devices: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis of a Single-Center 15-Year Experience.经皮脊髓刺激器设备的取出:单中心 15 年经验的回顾性描述性分析。
Pain Med. 2019 Jul 1;20(7):1355-1361. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny245.
3
Spinal cord stimulator explantation for magnetic resonance imaging: a case series.用于磁共振成像的脊髓刺激器取出术:病例系列
Neuromodulation. 2015 Jun;18(4):285-8; discussion 288. doi: 10.1111/ner.12254. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
4
Multicenter Retrospective Study of Neurostimulation With Exit of Therapy by Explant.关于通过取出装置终止治疗的神经刺激的多中心回顾性研究。
Neuromodulation. 2017 Aug;20(6):543-552. doi: 10.1111/ner.12634. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
Surgical paddle-lead placement for screening trials of spinal cord stimulation.用于脊髓刺激筛查试验的手术桨状电极放置
Neuromodulation. 2014 Jun;17(4):346-8; discussion 348. doi: 10.1111/ner.12084. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
6
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Computed Tomographic Analysis of Lead Position Between Three-Column and Five-Column Paddle Leads Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.三柱与五柱电极脊髓刺激治疗腰椎手术失败综合征的临床疗效及电极位置的计算机断层扫描分析比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;97:292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Rate of Complications Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Electrode Removal.脊髓刺激板状电极移除后的并发症发生率
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):513-519. doi: 10.1111/ner.12643. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
8
Complete coverage of phantom limb and stump pain with constant current SCS system: a case report and review of the literature.恒流脊髓刺激系统对幻肢痛和残端痛的完全覆盖:一例病例报告及文献综述
Pain Pract. 2015 Jan;15(1):E20-6. doi: 10.1111/papr.12226. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Immediate Abdominal Pain after Placement of Thoracic Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Series.脊髓刺激胸段电极置入后立即出现腹痛:病例系列
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(6):400-405. doi: 10.1159/000495415. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激的植入取出率及医疗资源利用情况
Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):331-339. doi: 10.1111/ner.12567. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.美国疼痛与神经科学学会关于使用60天外周神经刺激疗法的共识指南。一个NEURON生活指南项目。
J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 24;18:3117-3139. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S521788. eCollection 2025.
2
Erroneous intramedullary placement of spinal cord stimulator: A case report and review of the literature.脊髓刺激器髓内放置错误:一例病例报告及文献综述
Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Apr 18;16:144. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1035_2024. eCollection 2025.
3
Spinal Cord Stimulation Explantation and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Technology Recommendations.
脊髓刺激器植入物取出与慢性疼痛:系统评价及技术建议
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 18;18:1327-1340. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S514732. eCollection 2025.
4
Explantation and Simultaneous Explantation-Reimplantation of Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Electrodes: Complication Rate and Predisposing Factors.脊髓刺激板状电极的取出及同期取出-再植入:并发症发生率及易感因素
Neurosurg Pract. 2023 Aug 18;4(3):e00055. doi: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000055. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Removal Forces of a Helical Microwire Structure Electrode.螺旋微丝结构电极的拔除力
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;11(6):611. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060611.
6
Primary 3-Month Outcomes of a Double-Blind Randomized Prospective Study (The QUEST Study) Assessing Effectiveness and Safety of Novel High-Frequency Electric Nerve Block System for Treatment of Post-Amputation Pain.一项双盲随机前瞻性研究(QUEST研究)的3个月主要结果:评估新型高频电神经阻滞系统治疗截肢后疼痛的有效性和安全性。
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 6;17:2001-2014. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S463727. eCollection 2024.
7
Neuromodulation and Habituation: A Literature Review and Conceptional Analysis of Sustaining Therapeutic Efficacy and Mitigating Habituation.神经调节与习惯化:关于维持治疗效果及减轻习惯化的文献综述与概念分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):930. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050930.
8
Fully implanted battery-free high power platform for chronic spinal and muscular functional electrical stimulation.全植入式免电池高能平台,用于慢性脊髓和肌肉功能性电刺激。
Nat Commun. 2023 Nov 30;14(1):7887. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43669-2.
9
ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial.ECAP 控制的闭环与开环 SCS 治疗慢性疼痛:EVOKE 双盲随机临床试验的 36 个月结果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 May 7;49(5):346-354. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104751.
10
Long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: 24-Month results of a randomized controlled trial.高频(10 kHz)脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验的 24 个月结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Sep;203:110865. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110865. Epub 2023 Aug 1.