School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; HIV AIDS Vaccines Ethics Group (HAVEG), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2017 Aug 25;107(9):741-744. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i9.12525.
South Africa (SA) has progressive legislation enabling adolescents to access various sexual- and reproductive-health services (SRH) independently, without consent from parents or legal guardians. This article reviews the SA legislative framework for adolescent access to SRH interventions. It outlines the five approaches adopted in current legislation to address adolescents' capacity to independently consent to specified health interventions, based on age, capacity and public policy requirements, or combinations thereof. Rather than subsume various health interventions under the umbrella of medical treatment, SA has separately legislated on many SRH interventions (e.g. HIV testing, contraceptives and terminations of pregnancy, among others). We identify strengths and weaknesses of the SA approach, and conclude with lessons learned from the SA experience which could inform discussion and debate on the most appropriate ways for countries to consider law reform that facilitates adolescent access to SRH services.
南非(SA)拥有进步的立法,使青少年能够独立地获得各种性健康和生殖健康服务(SRH),而无需征得父母或法定监护人的同意。本文回顾了南非青少年获得 SRH 干预措施的立法框架。它概述了现行立法中基于年龄、能力和公共政策要求或其组合,为解决青少年独立同意特定健康干预措施的能力而采用的五种方法。南非没有将各种健康干预措施归入医疗治疗的范畴,而是对许多 SRH 干预措施(例如 HIV 检测、避孕药具和终止妊娠等)进行了单独立法。我们确定了南非方法的优缺点,并从南非经验中得出结论,这些结论可以为关于最适当的法律改革方式的讨论和辩论提供信息,以促进青少年获得 SRH 服务。