Feng Mei, Wu Ying, Zhu Jing, Wu Xiaoling
West China Hospital, Wainanguoxuexiang 65, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Regen Med Res. 2017;5:1. doi: 10.1051/rmr/160001. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
This study was performed to observe the efficacy of a modified surgical wound dressing applied as part of decannulation wound care after tracheotomy.
Eighty-four patients were randomly allocated into a traditional care group, a surgical wound dressing group, and a modified surgical wound dressing group. Each group comprised 28 patients. The following outcomes were observed and analyzed: infection rate, wound closure time, dressing change frequency, cost of wound care, and patients' comfort.
The infection rate, wound closure time, dressing change frequency, and cost of wound care were much higher in the traditional care group than in the surgical wound dressing group and modified surgical wound dressing group. The study data indicated that patients in the modified surgical dressing group felt more comfortable than those patients in the other two groups. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
The design of the herein-described modified surgical wound dressing is based on a butterfly shaped adhesive and mirrors the advantages of a modern surgical wound dressing. Its shape is suitable for the physiological structure of the neck, making it more comfortable to use. Aseptic packaging and a high degree of adhesiveness guarantee continuous fixation and pulling. At the same time, the design of the dressing decreases the chance of infection.
本研究旨在观察一种改良手术伤口敷料作为气管切开术后拔管伤口护理一部分的疗效。
84例患者被随机分为传统护理组、手术伤口敷料组和改良手术伤口敷料组。每组28例患者。观察并分析以下结果:感染率、伤口愈合时间、换药频率、伤口护理费用和患者舒适度。
传统护理组的感染率、伤口愈合时间、换药频率和伤口护理费用均显著高于手术伤口敷料组和改良手术伤口敷料组。研究数据表明,改良手术敷料组的患者比其他两组患者感觉更舒适。三组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
本文所述改良手术伤口敷料的设计基于蝶形粘合剂,兼具现代手术伤口敷料的优点。其形状适合颈部的生理结构,使用起来更舒适。无菌包装和高度粘性保证了持续固定和牵拉。同时,敷料的设计降低了感染几率。