• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猴子和人类在定位变化时会考虑局部不确定性。

Monkeys and humans take local uncertainty into account when localizing a change.

作者信息

Devkar Deepna, Wright Anthony A, Ma Wei Ji

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2017 Sep 1;17(11):4. doi: 10.1167/17.11.4.

DOI:10.1167/17.11.4
PMID:28877535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5588915/
Abstract

Since sensory measurements are noisy, an observer is rarely certain about the identity of a stimulus. In visual perception tasks, observers generally take their uncertainty about a stimulus into account when doing so helps task performance. Whether the same holds in visual working memory tasks is largely unknown. Ten human and two monkey subjects localized a single change in orientation between a sample display containing three ellipses and a test display containing two ellipses. To manipulate uncertainty, we varied the reliability of orientation information by making each ellipse more or less elongated (two levels); reliability was independent across the stimuli. In both species, a variable-precision encoding model equipped with an "uncertainty-indifferent" decision rule, which uses only the noisy memories, fitted the data poorly. In both species, a much better fit was provided by a model in which the observer also takes the levels of reliability-driven uncertainty associated with the memories into account. In particular, a measured change in a low-reliability stimulus was given lower weight than the same change in a high-reliability stimulus. We did not find strong evidence that observers took reliability-independent variations in uncertainty into account. Our results illustrate the importance of studying the decision stage in comparison tasks and provide further evidence for evolutionary continuity of working memory systems between monkeys and humans.

摘要

由于感官测量存在噪声,观察者很少能确定刺激的身份。在视觉感知任务中,当考虑刺激的不确定性有助于任务表现时,观察者通常会将其纳入考量。在视觉工作记忆任务中是否也是如此,在很大程度上尚不清楚。十名人类受试者和两只猴子受试者在一个包含三个椭圆的样本显示和一个包含两个椭圆的测试显示之间定位了方向上的单一变化。为了操纵不确定性,我们通过使每个椭圆或多或少地拉长(两个级别)来改变方向信息的可靠性;可靠性在不同刺激之间是独立的。在这两个物种中,一个配备“不确定性无差异”决策规则的可变精度编码模型,该模型仅使用有噪声的记忆,对数据的拟合效果很差。在这两个物种中,一个观察者还会考虑与记忆相关的可靠性驱动的不确定性水平的模型提供了更好的拟合。特别是,低可靠性刺激中的测量变化比高可靠性刺激中的相同变化权重更低。我们没有发现有力证据表明观察者考虑了与可靠性无关的不确定性变化。我们的结果说明了在比较任务中研究决策阶段的重要性,并为猴子和人类之间工作记忆系统的进化连续性提供了进一步的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/af4656d1208c/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/d4ce509b0776/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/91b5d595cdb5/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/7c29d2e31715/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/da442ca9ab1d/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/af4656d1208c/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/d4ce509b0776/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/91b5d595cdb5/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/7c29d2e31715/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/da442ca9ab1d/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112e/5588915/af4656d1208c/i1534-7362-17-11-4-f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Monkeys and humans take local uncertainty into account when localizing a change.猴子和人类在定位变化时会考虑局部不确定性。
J Vis. 2017 Sep 1;17(11):4. doi: 10.1167/17.11.4.
2
Visual short-term memory for oriented, colored objects.对有方向、有颜色物体的视觉短期记忆。
J Vis. 2017 Aug 1;17(9):12. doi: 10.1167/17.9.12.
3
Probabilistic computation in human perception under variability in encoding precision.在编码精度变化下人类感知中的概率计算。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e40216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040216. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
4
Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.视觉工作记忆中特征绑定的神经架构。
J Neurosci. 2017 Apr 5;37(14):3913-3925. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3493-16.2017. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
5
Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search.特征可靠性决定了定向搜索中知觉学习的特异性和迁移。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Dec 14;13(12):e1005882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005882. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
The same type of visual working memory limitations in humans and monkeys.人类和猴子存在相同类型的视觉工作记忆限制。
J Vis. 2015;15(16):13. doi: 10.1167/15.16.13.
7
Suboptimal Criterion Learning in Static and Dynamic Environments.静态和动态环境中的次优准则学习
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jan 3;13(1):e1005304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005304. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Uncertainty is maintained and used in working memory.不确定性在工作记忆中被维持和使用。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.13.
9
Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target.超越掩码并突破瓶颈:掩码视觉目标工作记忆巩固过程中的追溯性双任务干扰
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1409-1427. doi: 10.1037/a0035257. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
10
Discrimination of line orientation in humans and monkeys.人类和猴子对线条方向的辨别。
J Neurophysiol. 2000 May;83(5):2639-48. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2639.

引用本文的文献

1
Representation and computation in visual working memory.视觉工作记忆中的表示和计算。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1016-1034. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
2
Studying the neural representations of uncertainty.研究不确定性的神经表示。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Nov;26(11):1857-1867. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01444-y. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex.人类大脑皮层中工作记忆和不确定性的联合表示。

本文引用的文献

1
Fechner's law in metacognition: A quantitative model of visual working memory confidence.元认知中的费希纳定律:视觉工作记忆信心的定量模型。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;124(2):197-214. doi: 10.1037/rev0000060.
2
Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.考虑到精度方面特定于刺激的变化,揭示了视觉工作记忆中的离散容量限制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):6-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000302.
3
The same type of visual working memory limitations in humans and monkeys.
Neuron. 2021 Nov 17;109(22):3699-3712.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
4
Uncertainty is maintained and used in working memory.不确定性在工作记忆中被维持和使用。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.13.
5
Variable precision in visual perception.视觉感知的可变精度。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jan;126(1):89-132. doi: 10.1037/rev0000128. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
人类和猴子存在相同类型的视觉工作记忆限制。
J Vis. 2015;15(16):13. doi: 10.1167/15.16.13.
4
Neural coding of uncertainty and probability.不确定性和概率的神经编码。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:205-20. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014017.
5
"Plateau"-related summary statistics are uninformative for comparing working memory models.与“平台期”相关的汇总统计数据对于比较工作记忆模型并无助益。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):2117-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0618-7.
6
Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.延迟估计下颜色工作记忆中的刺激特异性变异性。
J Vis. 2014 Apr 8;14(4):7. doi: 10.1167/14.4.7.
7
Noise in neural populations accounts for errors in working memory.神经群体中的噪声导致工作记忆错误。
J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 5;34(10):3632-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3204-13.2014.
8
Changing concepts of working memory.工作记忆概念的变化。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56. doi: 10.1038/nn.3655. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Factorial comparison of working memory models.工作记忆模型的析因比较。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):124-49. doi: 10.1037/a0035234.
10
Discrete-slots models of visual working-memory response times.视觉工作记忆反应时的离散槽模型。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Oct;120(4):873-902. doi: 10.1037/a0034247. Epub 2013 Sep 9.