Department of Psychology, New York University, NY, USA.
Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, USA.
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.13.
What are the contents of working memory? In both behavioral and neural computational models, a working memory representation is typically described by a single number, namely, a point estimate of a stimulus. Here, we asked if people also maintain the uncertainty associated with a memory and if people use this uncertainty in subsequent decisions. We collected data in a two-condition orientation change detection task; while both conditions measured whether people used memory uncertainty, only one required maintaining it. For each condition, we compared an optimal Bayesian observer model, in which the observer uses an accurate representation of uncertainty in their decision, to one in which the observer does not. We find that this "Use Uncertainty" model fits better for all participants in both conditions. In the first condition, this result suggests that people use uncertainty optimally in a working memory task when that uncertainty information is available at the time of decision, confirming earlier results. Critically, the results of the second condition suggest that this uncertainty information was maintained in working memory. We test model variants and find that our conclusions do not depend on our assumptions about the observer's encoding process, inference process, or decision rule. Our results provide evidence that people have uncertainty that reflects their memory precision on an item-specific level, maintain this information over a working memory delay, and use it implicitly in a way consistent with an optimal observer. These results challenge existing computational models of working memory to update their frameworks to represent uncertainty.
工作记忆的内容是什么?在行为和神经计算模型中,工作记忆的表示通常由单个数字描述,即刺激的点估计。在这里,我们询问人们是否也保持与记忆相关的不确定性,以及人们是否在后续决策中使用这种不确定性。我们在两种条件的方向变化检测任务中收集数据;虽然两种条件都测量了人们是否使用记忆不确定性,但只有一种条件需要保持这种不确定性。对于每种条件,我们将最优贝叶斯观测器模型与不使用不确定性的观测器模型进行比较。我们发现,在两种条件下,所有参与者的“使用不确定性”模型都更符合数据。在第一种条件下,这一结果表明,当决策时有可用的不确定性信息时,人们在工作记忆任务中会最优地使用不确定性,这证实了早期的结果。至关重要的是,第二种条件的结果表明,这种不确定性信息在工作记忆中得到了保持。我们测试了模型变体,发现我们的结论不依赖于我们对观察者的编码过程、推断过程或决策规则的假设。我们的结果提供了证据,表明人们具有反映其特定项目记忆精度的不确定性,在工作记忆延迟期间保持这种信息,并以与最优观察者一致的方式隐含地使用它。这些结果挑战了现有的工作记忆计算模型,要求它们更新框架以表示不确定性。