John Snow, Inc., Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Avenir Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):399-411. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00395. Print 2017 Sep 27.
To address challenges in public health supply chain performance, Tanzania invested in a national logistics management unit (LMU) and a national electronic logistics management information system (eLMIS). This evaluation examined the impact of those 2 key management upgrades approximately 1 year after they were introduced.
We used a nonexperimental pre-post study design to compare the previous system with the upgraded management system. We collected baseline data from August to November 2013. We conducted round 1 of post-implementation data collection during April and May 2015, about 1 year after implementation of the upgrades. We evaluated key indicators of data use and reporting; supply chain management practices such as storage and supervision; supply chain performance including stock-out and expiry rates; and supply chain cost and savings. We analyzed the data using a range of techniques including statistical testing of baseline and round-1 results, and cost, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment analysis.
The upgrades were associated with improvements in data use, accessibility, visibility, and transparency; planning, control, and monitoring; support for quantification; stock-out rates; stock-out duration; commodity expiry; and forecast error. The upgraded system was more costly, but it was also more efficient, particularly when adjusting for the performance improvements. The upgrades also generated substantial savings that defrayed some, but not all, of the investment costs.
Upgrades to Tanzania's supply chain management systems created multiple and complex pathways to impact. One year after implementation, the LMU and eLMIS brought about performance improvements through better data use and through improvements in some, but not all, management practices. Furthermore, the upgrades-while not inexpensive-contributed to greater system efficiency and modest savings.
为了解决公共卫生供应链绩效方面的挑战,坦桑尼亚投资设立了国家后勤管理股(LMU)和国家电子后勤管理信息系统(eLMIS)。本评估在这两项关键管理升级推出约一年后,考察了其影响。
我们采用非实验性的前后研究设计,将前一个系统与升级后的管理系统进行比较。我们于 2013 年 8 月至 11 月收集基线数据。我们于 2015 年 4 月至 5 月进行第一轮实施后数据收集,即升级后约一年。我们评估了数据使用和报告、储存和监督等供应链管理实践、包括缺货率和过期率在内的供应链绩效,以及供应链成本和节约情况等关键指标。我们使用一系列技术对数据进行分析,包括对基线和第一轮结果进行统计检验,以及成本、成本效益和投资回报率分析。
升级后数据的使用、获取、可见度和透明度,规划、控制和监测,量化支持,缺货率、缺货持续时间、商品过期和预测误差都得到了改善。升级后的系统成本更高,但效率也更高,尤其是在调整了绩效改善因素之后。升级还带来了大量节约,部分抵消了投资成本。
坦桑尼亚供应链管理系统的升级通过更好的数据使用和一些(但不是全部)管理实践的改善,为产生影响创造了多种复杂的途径。实施一年后,LMU 和 eLMIS 通过提高数据使用和某些管理实践,实现了绩效改善。此外,升级虽然不便宜,但提高了系统效率,并带来适度节约。