Amaral Robson L F, Miranda Mariza, Marcato Priscyla D, Swiech Kamilla
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil.
Front Physiol. 2017 Aug 22;8:605. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00605. eCollection 2017.
Cell-based assays using three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures may reflect the antitumor activity of compounds more accurately, since these models reproduce the tumor microenvironment better. Here, we report a comparative analysis of cell behavior in the two most widely employed methods for 3D spheroid culture, forced floating (Ultra-low Attachment, ULA, plates), and hanging drop (HD) methods, using the RT4 human bladder cancer cell line as a model. The morphology parameters and growth/metabolism of the spheroids generated were first characterized, using four different cell-seeding concentrations (0.5, 1.25, 2.5, and 3.75 × 10 cells/mL), and then, subjected to drug resistance evaluation. Both methods generated spheroids with a smooth surface and round shape in a spheroidization time of about 48 h, regardless of the cell-seeding concentration used. Reduced cell growth and metabolism was observed in 3D cultures compared to two-dimensional (2D) cultures. The optimal range of spheroid diameter (300-500 μm) was obtained using cultures initiated with 0.5 and 1.25 × 10 cells/mL for the ULA method and 2.5 and 3.75 × 10 cells/mL for the HD method. RT4 cells cultured under 3D conditions also exhibited a higher resistance to doxorubicin (IC of 1.00 and 0.83 μg/mL for the ULA and HD methods, respectively) compared to 2D cultures (IC ranging from 0.39 to 0.43). Comparing the results, we concluded that the forced floating method using ULA plates was considered more suitable and straightforward to generate RT4 spheroids for drug screening/cytotoxicity assays. The results presented here also contribute to the improvement in the standardization of the 3D cultures required for widespread application.
使用三维(3D)细胞培养的基于细胞的检测可能更准确地反映化合物的抗肿瘤活性,因为这些模型能更好地重现肿瘤微环境。在此,我们报告了以RT4人膀胱癌细胞系为模型,对两种最广泛使用的3D球体培养方法,即强制漂浮(超低附着,ULA,平板)和悬滴(HD)方法中细胞行为的比较分析。首先使用四种不同的细胞接种浓度(0.5、1.25、2.5和3.75×10个细胞/毫升)对生成的球体的形态参数和生长/代谢进行表征,然后进行耐药性评估。无论使用何种细胞接种浓度,两种方法在约48小时的球化时间内均产生了表面光滑、形状圆形的球体。与二维(2D)培养相比,在3D培养中观察到细胞生长和代谢减少。对于ULA方法,使用0.5和1.25×10个细胞/毫升起始培养,对于HD方法,使用2.5和3.75×10个细胞/毫升起始培养,可获得300 - 500μm的最佳球体直径范围。与2D培养(IC范围为0.39至0.43)相比,在3D条件下培养的RT4细胞对多柔比星也表现出更高的耐药性(ULA和HD方法的IC分别为1.00和0.83μg/毫升)。比较结果后,我们得出结论,使用ULA平板的强制漂浮方法被认为更适合且直接用于生成用于药物筛选/细胞毒性检测的RT4球体。此处呈现的结果也有助于改进广泛应用所需的3D培养的标准化。