Unim Brigid, Lagerberg Tyra, Pitini Erica, De Vito Corrado, Vacchio Maria Rosaria, Adamo Giovanna, Rosso Annalisa, D'Andrea Elvira, Marzuillo Carolina, Villari Paolo
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Better Value HealthCare, Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 22;5:223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00223. eCollection 2017.
The appropriate application of genomic technologies in healthcare is surrounded by many concerns. In particular, there is a lack of evidence on what constitutes an optimal genetic service delivery model, which depends on the type of genetic test and healthcare context considered. The present project aims to identify, classify, and evaluate delivery models for the provision of predictive genetic testing in Europe and in selected Anglophone extra-European countries (the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand). It also sets out to survey the European public health community's readiness to incorporate public health genomics into their practice.
The project consists of (i) a systematic review of published literature and selected country websites, (ii) structured interviews with health experts on the genetic service delivery models in their respective countries, and (iii) a survey of European Public Health Association (EUPHA) members' knowledge and attitudes toward genomics applications in clinical practice. The inclusion criteria for the systematic review are that articles be published in the period 2000-2015; be in English or Italian; and be from European countries or from Canada, the USA, Australia, or New Zealand. Additional policy documents will be retrieved from represented countries' government-affiliated websites. The results of the research will be disseminated through the EUPHA network, the Italian Network for Genomics in Public Health (GENISAP), and seminars and workshops.
The transfer of genomic technologies from research to clinical application is influenced not only by several factors inherent to research goals and delivery of healthcare but also by external and commercial interests that may cause the premature introduction of genetic tests in the public and private sectors. Furthermore, current genetic services are delivered without a standardized set of process and outcome measures, which makes the evaluation of healthcare services difficult. The present study will identify and classify delivery models and, subsequently, establish which are appropriate for the provision of predictive genetic testing in Europe by comparing sets of process and outcome measures. In this way, the study will provide a basis for future recommendations to decision makers involved in the financing, delivery, and consumption of genetic services.
基因组技术在医疗保健中的合理应用引发了诸多担忧。特别是,对于什么构成最佳基因服务提供模式缺乏证据,这取决于所考虑的基因检测类型和医疗保健背景。本项目旨在识别、分类和评估欧洲以及选定的非欧洲英语国家(美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰)提供预测性基因检测的服务提供模式。它还着手调查欧洲公共卫生界将公共卫生基因组学纳入其实践的准备情况。
该项目包括:(i)对已发表文献和选定国家网站进行系统综述;(ii)就各自国家的基因服务提供模式对健康专家进行结构化访谈;(iii)对欧洲公共卫生协会(EUPHA)成员关于基因组学在临床实践中应用的知识和态度进行调查。系统综述的纳入标准是文章发表于2000年至2015年期间;语言为英语或意大利语;来自欧洲国家或加拿大、美国、澳大利亚或新西兰。其他政策文件将从所代表国家的政府附属网站获取。研究结果将通过EUPHA网络、意大利公共卫生基因组学网络(GENISAP)以及研讨会和讲习班进行传播。
基因组技术从研究向临床应用的转化不仅受到研究目标和医疗保健提供中固有的若干因素的影响,还受到可能导致基因检测在公共和私营部门过早引入的外部和商业利益的影响。此外,当前的基因服务在没有一套标准化的过程和结果衡量标准的情况下提供,这使得医疗服务的评估变得困难。本研究将识别和分类服务提供模式,随后通过比较过程和结果衡量标准集来确定哪些模式适合在欧洲提供预测性基因检测。通过这种方式,该研究将为未来向参与基因服务融资、提供和消费的决策者提出建议提供依据。