Suppr超能文献

地点仍然重要:HIV 传播和疾病负担中的种族/民族和地理差异。

Place Still Matters: Racial/Ethnic and Geographic Disparities in HIV Transmission and Disease Burden.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Room 419, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2017 Oct;94(5):716-729. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0198-2.

Abstract

Neighborhood-level structural interventions are needed to address HIV/AIDS in highly affected areas. To develop these interventions, we need a better understanding of contextual factors that drive the pandemic. We used multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between census tract of current residence and mode of HIV transmission among HIV-positive cases. Compared to the predominantly white high HIV prevalence tract, both the predominantly black high and low HIV prevalence tracts had greater odds of transmission via injection drug use and heterosexual contact than male-to-male sexual contact. After adjusting for current age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and most recently recorded CD4 count, there was no statistically significant difference in mode of HIV transmission by census tract. However, heterosexual transmission and injection drug use remain key concerns for underserved populations. Blacks were seven times more likely than whites to have heterosexual versus male-to-male sexual contact. Those who had Medicaid or were uninsured (versus private insurance) were 23 and 14 times more likely, respectively, to have injection drug use than male-to-male sexual contact and 10 times more likely to have heterosexual contact than male-to-male sexual contact. These findings can inform larger studies for the development of neighborhood-level structural interventions.

摘要

需要在社区层面进行结构性干预,以解决高流行地区的艾滋病毒/艾滋病问题。为了制定这些干预措施,我们需要更好地了解推动大流行的各种背景因素。我们使用多项逻辑回归模型来研究当前居住地的普查区与艾滋病毒阳性病例的传播方式之间的关系。与主要为白人、艾滋病毒流行率较高的普查区相比,主要为黑人和艾滋病毒流行率较高和较低的普查区通过注射吸毒和异性性接触传播的几率均大于男男性接触。在调整了当前年龄、性别、种族/民族、保险状况和最近记录的 CD4 计数后,按普查区划分的艾滋病毒传播方式并无统计学差异。然而,异性性传播和注射吸毒仍然是服务不足人群的主要关注点。与白人相比,黑人发生异性性接触而不是男男性接触的可能性要高出 7 倍。与私人保险相比,拥有医疗补助或没有保险(而非私人保险)的人分别更有可能通过注射吸毒而不是男男性接触,以及更有可能通过异性性接触而不是男男性接触。这些发现可以为制定社区层面的结构性干预措施提供信息。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
A Systematic Review of Neighborhood-Level Influences on HIV Vulnerability.社区层面影响艾滋病易感性的系统评价
AIDS Behav. 2022 Mar;26(3):874-934. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03448-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验