Baxter Daniel, Ullman Christopher G, Frigotto Laura, Mason Jody M
Dept of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath , Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
Isogenica Ltd. , Chesterford Research Park, Little Chesterford, Essex CB10 1XL, United Kingdom.
ACS Chem Biol. 2017 Oct 20;12(10):2579-2588. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00693. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
We have combined two peptide library-screening systems, exploiting the benefits offered by both to select novel antagonistic agents of cJun. CIS display is an in vitro cell-free system that allows very large libraries (≤10) to be interrogated. However, affinity-based screening conditions can poorly reflect those relevant to therapeutic application, particularly for difficult intracellular targets, and can lead to false positives. In contrast, an in cellulo screening system such as the Protein-fragment Complementation Assay (PCA) selects peptides with high target affinity while additionally profiling for target specificity, protease resistance, solubility, and lack of toxicity in a more relevant context. A disadvantage is the necessity to transform cells, limiting library sizes that can be screened to ≤10. However, by combining both cell-free and cell-based systems, we isolated a peptide (CPW) from a ∼10 member library, which forms a highly stable interaction with cJun (T = 63 °C, K = 750 nM, ΔG = -8.2 kcal/mol) using the oncogenic transcriptional regulator Activator Protein-1 (AP-1) as our exemplar target. In contrast, CIS display alone selected a peptide with low affinity for cJun (T = 34 °C, K = 25 μM, ΔG = -6.2 kcal/mol), highlighting the benefit of CIS → PCA. Furthermore, increased library size with CIS → PCA vs PCA alone allows the freedom to introduce noncanonical options, such as interfacial aromatics, and solvent exposed options that may allow the molecule to explore alternative structures and interact with greater affinity and efficacy with the target. CIS → PCA therefore offers significant potential as a peptide-library screening platform by synergistically combining the relative attributes of both assays to generate therapeutically interesting compounds that may otherwise not be identified.
我们结合了两种肽库筛选系统,利用两者的优势来选择新型的cJun拮抗剂。CIS展示是一种体外无细胞系统,能够对非常大的文库(≤10)进行筛选。然而,基于亲和力的筛选条件可能无法很好地反映与治疗应用相关的条件,特别是对于难以靶向的细胞内靶点,并且可能导致假阳性。相比之下,像蛋白质片段互补分析(PCA)这样的细胞内筛选系统在选择具有高靶点亲和力的肽的同时,还能在更相关的环境中对靶点特异性、蛋白酶抗性、溶解性和无毒性进行分析。一个缺点是需要对细胞进行转化,这将可筛选的文库大小限制为≤10。然而,通过结合无细胞和基于细胞的系统,我们从一个约10成员的文库中分离出一种肽(CPW),该肽与cJun形成高度稳定的相互作用(T = 63 °C,K = 750 nM,ΔG = -8.2 kcal/mol),我们以致癌转录调节因子激活蛋白-1(AP-1)作为示例靶点。相比之下,单独的CIS展示选择了一种对cJun亲和力较低的肽(T = 34 °C,K = 25 μM,ΔG = -6.2 kcal/mol),突出了CIS→PCA的优势。此外,与单独使用PCA相比,CIS→PCA增加了文库大小,使得能够自由引入非规范的选择,例如界面芳香族基团,以及可能使分子探索替代结构并以更高亲和力和效力与靶点相互作用的溶剂暴露基团。因此,CIS→PCA通过协同结合两种分析方法的相对属性,提供了作为肽库筛选平台的巨大潜力,以生成可能无法通过其他方式鉴定出来的具有治疗意义的化合物。