Mulder C L, van Weeghel J, Wierdsma A, Zoeteman J, Schene A
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2017;59(9):537-545.
'Bewildered persons' have often been in the news over the last few years. There has been much discussion about the meaning of the term 'bewildered persons', the number of people involved, the way the problem should be tackled and the role of the mental health services.
AIM: To look critically at the term 'bewildered persons' and to discuss the suspected increase in numbers and the role of mental health services.
METHOD: Review and discussion of the relevant literature relating to 'bewildered persons' which has been published in the last 25 years.
RESULTS: The term 'bewildered persons' is a general label given by the Dutch police to several groups of people. Suicide rates are rising and more and more people are being compulsorily admitted to psychiatric clinics and hospitals. These factors indicate that increasing numbers of people may now be a danger to themselves and to their fellow-citizens. It is not clear whether the increase in numbers is real or simply reflects the extra attention given by the police. These people may in fact be a new group consisting of persons already known to the mental health services. A national team that aims to improve the care of 'bewildered persons' has made several recommendations to stop the increase: prevention and better cooperation between municipalities and mental health facilities. In our view the mental health services should operate at the front-line of the public mental health service, providing low-threshold diagnostics, assertive outreach and treatment for patients who have mental disorders but are unwilling to accept care or treatment. Such a service requires adequate finance, good cooperative agreements and removal of the bureaucratic and financial barriers that prevent patients from seeking care.
CONCLUSION: 'Bewildered persons' is an umbrella term used to denote people who urgently require care and are a public nuisance and who display disturbing behavior. 'Bewildered persons', who now form a part of the group of people targeted by the public health services, have been around for a long time but have been referred to by different names. They require the structured assistance of integrated care, access to social and medical services and timely diagnosis and treatment. People who have somehow slipped through the net of care facilities should not be left to fend for themselves.
在过去几年里,“困惑者”常常出现在新闻中。关于“困惑者”一词的含义、涉及的人数、解决该问题的方式以及心理健康服务的作用,已经有了很多讨论。
批判性地审视“困惑者”这一术语,并讨论疑似人数增加的情况以及心理健康服务的作用。
回顾并讨论过去25年里发表的与“困惑者”相关的文献。
“困惑者”一词是荷兰警方给几类人群的统称。自杀率在上升,越来越多的人被强制送往精神病诊所和医院。这些因素表明,现在可能有越来越多的人对自己和其他公民构成危险。目前尚不清楚人数的增加是真实的,还是仅仅反映了警方给予的额外关注。这些人实际上可能是一个由心理健康服务机构已经了解的人员组成的新群体。一个旨在改善对“困惑者”护理的国家队提出了几项建议以阻止人数增加:预防以及城市与心理健康机构之间更好的合作。我们认为,心理健康服务机构应在公共心理健康服务的第一线开展工作,为患有精神障碍但不愿接受护理或治疗的患者提供低门槛诊断、积极的外展服务和治疗。这样的服务需要充足的资金、良好的合作协议以及消除阻碍患者寻求护理的官僚和财务障碍。
“困惑者”是一个总括性术语,用于指代那些急需护理、对公众造成困扰且行为令人不安的人。“困惑者”长期以来一直存在,现在是公共卫生服务机构的目标人群之一,但曾被用不同的名称提及。他们需要综合护理的结构化协助、获得社会和医疗服务以及及时的诊断和治疗。那些不知怎么从护理机构的网中溜走的人不应被弃之不顾。